On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Hi,
I packaged an update squid 2.4.STABLE6 for Debian woody with the
backported squid-2.5.STABLE9-dns_query from RedHat RHSA-2005-489, which
is quite straight.
With this patch squid fails[1] with
rfc1035.c:410: rfc1035RRUnpack: Assertion `(*off)
Il giorno gio, 14/07/2005 alle 09.52 -0600, Duane Wessels ha scritto:
I can (mostly) understand the RFC1035 code, but I cannot reproduce this
bug. Can you reproduce it?
If you can get a core file and stack trace that would be helpful.
Also if you know anything about the type of nameserver
Hi Duane,
thanks for your answer. I'm in contact with users that can reproduce the
bug and provided them an unstripped version for the stack trace. In the
meanwhile they reported that the bug appears with both dnscache (from
djbdns-1.05) and pdnsd, both in standalone and transparent mode.
I'm
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Hi,
I packaged an update squid 2.4.STABLE6 for Debian woody with the
backported squid-2.5.STABLE9-dns_query from RedHat RHSA-2005-489, which
is quite straight.
With this patch squid fails[1] with
rfc1035.c:410: rfc1035RRUnpack: Assertion `(*off)
Hi,
I packaged an update squid 2.4.STABLE6 for Debian woody with the
backported squid-2.5.STABLE9-dns_query from RedHat RHSA-2005-489, which
is quite straight.
With this patch squid fails[1] with
rfc1035.c:410: rfc1035RRUnpack: Assertion `(*off) = sz' failed
which can be reproduced accessing
