lör 2007-03-03 klockan 08:39 +0800 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> helpers/basic_auth/Makefile.am:6: required directory
> helpers/basic_auth/POP3 does not exist
cvs update -d -P
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Hi Steven,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> Bootstrapping
> helpers/basic_auth/Makefile.am:6: required directory
> helpers/basic_auth/POP3 does not exist
> configure.in:3297: required file `helpers/basic_auth/POP3/Makefile.in' not
> found
> automake failed
> Autotool bootstrapping failed. You wi
> fre 2007-03-02 klockan 10:02 +0900 skrev Steven Wilton:
>
>> I know this is a minor problem, but I had problems getting the squid3
>> bootstrap.sh script to run, so I couldn't test the patch. I'm pretty
>> sure
>> it's got something to do with the version of automake and autoconf on my
>> system
lör 2007-03-03 klockan 03:29 +1300 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> configure.in:34: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_LTDL_DLLIB
> If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
> See the Autoconf documentation.
Looks like aclocal not finding the libtool macros (LT
fre 2007-03-02 klockan 10:02 +0900 skrev Steven Wilton:
> I know this is a minor problem, but I had problems getting the squid3
> bootstrap.sh script to run, so I couldn't test the patch. I'm pretty sure
> it's got something to do with the version of automake and autoconf on my
> system, but I co
>>
>>
>> I know this is a minor problem, but I had problems getting the squid3
>> bootstrap.sh script to run, so I couldn't test the patch. I'm pretty
>> sure
>> it's got something to do with the version of automake and autoconf on my
>> system, but I couldn't find a reference to which versions I
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Guido Serassio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, 2 March 2007 5:51 AM
>> To: Henrik Nordstrom; Jeremy Hall
>> Cc: Squid Developers
>> Subject: Re: squid3 comments
>>
>>
>> I have alway
> -Original Message-
> From: Guido Serassio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 2 March 2007 5:51 AM
> To: Henrik Nordstrom; Jeremy Hall
> Cc: Squid Developers
> Subject: Re: squid3 comments
>
>
> I have always hoped than some other developer with a m
Hi Henrik,
At 17.31 01/03/2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
But hopefully the forward porting of bug fixes from Squid-2 has helped.
At least it won't have most of the bugs fixed in Squid-2 since the two
code bases forked 4.5 years ago.. Many many thanks to Guido which has
done a great job in helpi
ons 2007-02-28 klockan 09:19 -0500 skrev Jeremy Hall:
> Is squid3 faster or slower than squid2?
From my incomplete tests and experience:
Squid-3 is noticeably slower than Squid-2.6, but not by a huge amount.
Squid-3 is faster than Squid-2.5 in some workloads involving many
concurrent connection
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 17:54 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> >
> > I think we should start from stating the goal of these changes in
> > Squid
> > 3.0. If they are for performance improvement, I would suggest waiting
> > until v3.1 or until performance te
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 17:54 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
> I think we should start from stating the goal of these changes in
> Squid
> 3.0. If they are for performance improvement, I would suggest waiting
> until v3.1 or until performance tests indicate that we must improve
> Squid 3 performance
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 20:48 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
> As an example of such changes I am attaching the rewritten
> parseHttpRequest, prepareTransparentURL and prepareAcceleratedURL
>
> A second example: again In parseHttpRequest we have the HttpParser
> struct which we are using it to pa
Tsantilas Christos wrote:
>
>
> As an example of such changes I am attaching the rewritten
> parseHttpRequest, prepareTransparentURL and prepareAcceleratedURL
>
Sorry to all
the code I send in previous mail will not compile. I am sending it
again. Needs some more testing to be sure that it is OK
Hi Alex,
Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
> I agree that many Squid3 parts should be fixed, polished, or thrown
> away. However, I think that we should focus on making Squid3 stable
> first, and the performance/polishing work you are discussing should be
> done for v3.1.
>
I am not
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:19 -0500, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> Is squid3 faster or slower than squid2?
I will be doing performance tests with Squid3 shortly. Will post.
Alex.
Is squid3 faster or slower than squid2?
_J
>>> Alex Rousskov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/27/07 5:04 PM
>>>
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 13:27 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
> In the other hand I need a proxy with an icap client because I spent
> time (and continue spending) to an icap related project. Squ
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your answers. As I can understand you are talking about
the squid4 project. If you want an independent opinion, I believe that
it is not good idea to start striping the squid2.
You will get again the same mistakes done at squid3. For a such project
start from ground
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:25 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> >
> > > Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3 and
> > > its stability, you get anything from "it's stable" to "not for prim
> Perhaps the "storework branch" will become a reference implementation to
> speedup Squid3 when the time comes :-). I would prefer that folks spent
> more energy on Squid 3.0 to make it stable faster (and only then
> optimize Squid 3.1), but I am not going to call every project that is
> not helpi
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:00 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> > So are you saying those of us that need icap need to just wait?
>
> There's two parts.
>
> One: Alex is working on improvements to the ICAP code in Squid-3 which
> I hope will act as a kind of re
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:25 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
>
> > Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3 and
> > its stability, you get anything from "it's stable" to "not for prime
> > time" and when you ask questions about using it
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 13:27 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
> In the other hand I need a proxy with an icap client because I spent
> time (and continue spending) to an icap related project. Squid3 has a
> good icap client. The first problem someones can see in squid3 is that
> there are some p
>>> Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/27/07 10:00 AM >>>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> I think we are on the same page for end-term goals, but what would
you
> recommend I do for today? Squid-3 is still a moving target.
> So are you saying those of us that need icap need to just
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> I think we are on the same page for end-term goals, but what would you
> recommend I do for today? Squid-3 is still a moving target.
> So are you saying those of us that need icap need to just wait?
There's two parts.
One: Alex is working on improvemen
>>> Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/27/07 9:25 AM >>>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3
and
> its stability, you get anything from "it's stable" to "not for prime
> time" and when you ask questions about using it in a
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3 and
> its stability, you get anything from "it's stable" to "not for prime
> time" and when you ask questions about using it in a production
> environment, most shy away from that.
* noone
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
> Ok Adrian, I am watching the mailing list and I know what you want to
> do. I believe too that some parts of squid needs redesign, if the
> project wants to survive. Squid is an old and huge project. And you
> must continue your work because y
>>> Tsantilas Christos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/27/07 6:27
AM >>>
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Chadd wrote:
agree .
> Yes, I'd like to do all of what you've suggested above but I'm going
to do it by
> junking most of the client-side request/reply handling routines and
replacing them
> with stuff writ
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Chadd wrote:
They make sense but you'd be repeating the work I've done in the squid-2-HEAD
branch.
OK, but it is in squid2 ...
Whats really needed is some more thought about the structure of the code.
I agree with you .
Want to know what else is silly in the cli
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>I was looking in squid3 code last days. I read again Adrian's mails
> in which he complained about squid3 speed, and cpu usage.
>
> Looking in the code there are a number of code-pieces which can
> improved. An example is the call
31 matches
Mail list logo
