tor 2007-04-12 klockan 13:19 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
> IMO, if we can support enough directives to accommodate 51% of current
> Squid2 users, that is enough.
More importantly, thanks to the new major features of Squid-3 such as a
good ICAP client we might attract new users again, not only exis
tor 2007-04-12 klockan 20:31 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio:
> Here I think that a methodical comparison between 2.6 and 3.0 is needed.
Not so sure. Find it much more important Squid-3 is stable than feature
complete wrt 2.6.
> Probably there are a lot of not so big changes missing in 3.0.
Very li
Hi Henrik,
At 00.55 12/04/2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
tis 2007-04-10 klockan 21:38 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
> Squid 3.1 is whatever comes after a stable 3.0 release. Open to
> experimentation. Not currently branched (but could be if needed).
I think it might be wise to branch Squid-3.0 afte
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 20:31 +0200, Guido Serassio wrote:
> >The probably biggest yell from users will be the lack of support for
> >passthru connection oriented authentication (NTLM/Negotiate/Kerberos),
> >aka connection pinning. The rest of the feature gaps is pretty minor I
> >think.
>
> Here I
tis 2007-04-10 klockan 21:38 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
> Squid 3.1 is whatever comes after a stable 3.0 release. Open to
> experimentation. Not currently branched (but could be if needed).
I think it might be wise to branch Squid-3.0 after PRE6, and that the
model currently used for Squid-2 is th
Hi Henrik,
At 17.18 05/05/2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
For those who have not been on the #squid-dev IRC channel lately I can
tell that the last weeks has been quite interesting.
The most significant news is that Doug Dixon (aka ganso on the IRC) has
volunteered for the role as Squid-3.0.PRE4
