On 12/08/2008, at 4:28 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 16:20 +1000, Benno Rice wrote:
On 12/08/2008, at 4:05 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
By that do you mean you are syncing with the logic fix made for 3.1?
I didn't directly refer to that, no. I set up a set of simple unit
t
>
> On 12/08/2008, at 4:05 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>>>
>>> On 16/07/2008, at 4:12 PM, Benno Rice wrote:
>>>
Here are two patches against squid 2.HEAD.
The first completely changes the nature of method_t in order to
allow squid to pass through methods it doesn't know about. W
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 16:20 +1000, Benno Rice wrote:
> On 12/08/2008, at 4:05 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > By that do you mean you are syncing with the logic fix made for 3.1?
>
>
> I didn't directly refer to that, no. I set up a set of simple unit
> tests that checked compliance against the
On 12/08/2008, at 4:05 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 16/07/2008, at 4:12 PM, Benno Rice wrote:
Here are two patches against squid 2.HEAD.
The first completely changes the nature of method_t in order to
allow squid to pass through methods it doesn't know about. What is
currently called method
>
> On 16/07/2008, at 4:12 PM, Benno Rice wrote:
>
>> Here are two patches against squid 2.HEAD.
>>
>> The first completely changes the nature of method_t in order to
>> allow squid to pass through methods it doesn't know about. What is
>> currently called method_t becomes method_code_t and method
