I now have a simple patch for the bitfields issue. It turned out astyle
misread bitfield definitions as labels..
The block issue is not yet identified, but is not as irritating
either.
Regards
Henrik
sön 2003-02-23 klockan 00.33 skrev Robert Collins:
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 02:12, Henrik
Robert Collins wrote:
Should read:
struct
{
[...]
} Wais;
I don't think this is a biggy: as we get more OOP, anonymous structs
will dissappear almost completely.
Not completely I think. Using anonymous structs is quite handy for
grouping related members.
Here
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 02:12, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I don't think this is a biggy: as we get more OOP, anonymous structs
will dissappear almost completely.
Not completely I think. Using anonymous structs is quite handy for
grouping related members.
, in C