Re: astyle issues

2003-02-24 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
I now have a simple patch for the bitfields issue. It turned out astyle misread bitfield definitions as labels.. The block issue is not yet identified, but is not as irritating either. Regards Henrik sön 2003-02-23 klockan 00.33 skrev Robert Collins: On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 02:12, Henrik

Re: astyle issues

2003-02-22 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
Robert Collins wrote: Should read: struct { [...] } Wais; I don't think this is a biggy: as we get more OOP, anonymous structs will dissappear almost completely. Not completely I think. Using anonymous structs is quite handy for grouping related members. Here

Re: astyle issues

2003-02-22 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 02:12, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: Robert Collins wrote: I don't think this is a biggy: as we get more OOP, anonymous structs will dissappear almost completely. Not completely I think. Using anonymous structs is quite handy for grouping related members. , in C