On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 21:50, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> For challenge-reuse configurations it is still good but needs to purge old
> entries when the challenge is changed. Will look into this.
Well yes - the point is to cache some reasonable count for efficiency.
But when a challenge changes, entri
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 03:04, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> challenge-response caching: if the challenge given by the helper is the
> same, and the response is the same, it's a valid login a priori.
Ok. The use of this then obviously should be disabled i
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 03:04, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Robert, what is the purpose of the auth_user_hash_pointer in the ntlm
> scheme, and do you have any idea as to why the use of this would be
> growing a lot?
challenge-response caching: if the challenge given by the helper is the
same, and the
Robert, what is the purpose of the auth_user_hash_pointer in the ntlm
scheme, and do you have any idea as to why the use of this would be
growing a lot?
Regards
Henrik
