On tis, 2007-10-02 at 23:04 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Sure, but releasing v3.1 with a few _more_ features than v3.0 seems like
> a step in the right direction. I doubt we have or will have the capacity
> to implement all 2.x features in a single 3.x release in the foreseeable
> future. Some fe
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:25 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:58 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >> >
> >> > 1) "Prime candidates": Documented features that have at least one
> >> > developer or sponsor behind them, ready to commit time to fully
> >> develop
> >> > (i.e., write
> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:58 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> >
>> > 1) "Prime candidates": Documented features that have at least one
>> > developer or sponsor behind them, ready to commit time to fully
>> develop
>> > (i.e., write, test, document, commit, and provide initial support) the
>> > prop
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:58 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >
> > 1) "Prime candidates": Documented features that have at least one
> > developer or sponsor behind them, ready to commit time to fully develop
> > (i.e., write, test, document, commit, and provide initial support) the
> > proposed featu
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 19:16 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> > We already have "a TODO list" draft for 3.1:
>> > http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Squid&version=3.0&target_milestone=---&target_milestone=3.1&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASS
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 19:16 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > We already have "a TODO list" draft for 3.1:
> > http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Squid&version=3.0&target_milestone=---&target_milestone=3.1&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNE
