-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/10/2014 7:30 p.m., Jason Haar wrote:
> On 05/10/14 18:44, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> PS. Google with Chrome appear these days to be the champions of
>> unbreakable TLS, their software is continually being updated to
>> use/invent new TLS features t
Hello Robert,
Just my two cents - if you remove or comment out the
sslproxy_cert_error allow all
sslproxy_flags DONT_VERIFY_PEER
from squid config - may it be that squid starts complaining - "cannot get cert
issues locally" on the google sites?
Rafael.
From: Robert Watson mailto:rob...@gil
Thanks! What is the recommendation on packages vs building from source?
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 5/10/2014 4:49 p.m., Douglas Davenport wrote:
> > I'm starting from scratch with an AWS based squid setup, I woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Douglas,
CentOS 6 is a nice OS and I am releasing RPMs for it(now 3.4.8 out).
If you are using AWS they have a modified version of CentOS\RH which
they update and kind of support.
Self compiled for a cloud based machine to me seems a bit weird bu
This question is probably specifically for Eliezer.
My question is this, On the RPM repository at
http://www1.ngtech.co.il/rpm/ There is an RPM package for version
3.4.5 for Oracle Linux 6. I installed this a few months ago when I
was preparing to go live with a new Squid instance and now after a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/2014 01:22 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> MSIE 11 seems to be growing in popularity for some reason ;-)
>
> Amos
And Still there is:
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4115
For now I am using ssl_crtd of 3.4.5 for google ssl bump to wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey John,
OEL 6 and CentOS 6 are different enough to not be 100% compatible.
I cannot compare their DataBase but they are very similar so much that
almost none of their users will see the differences.
I would not recommend using 3.4.8 RPM for CentOS
N¬Æ¦º[b¥ªíë,j¢Â ú+«
Eliezer
It would be be great if you could manage to do a build 64bit OEL 6 build
this week, but I understand you will be under great time pressure, so I
will also try and perform a build from the SRPM this week also... However I
don't think I've ever successfully made a build from an SRPM before,
Hi guys
I have a need to encapsulate proxy requests thru a proxy, like the
ProxyRemote directive in Apache mod_proxy:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxyremote
http://www.xinotes.net/notes/note/980/
As I'm familiar with Squid, I'd like to have that same Apache functionality
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/10/2014 6:00 a.m., Ricardo Carrillo Cruz wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I have a need to encapsulate proxy requests thru a proxy, like the
> ProxyRemote directive in Apache mod_proxy:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxyremote
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/10/2014 5:36 a.m., John Gardner wrote:
> Eliezer
>
> It would be be great if you could manage to do a build 64bit OEL 6
> build this week, but I understand you will be under great time
> pressure, so I will also try and perform a build from the S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Rafael,
You can install it from epel but the core+sslbump doesn't require that.
Only the helpers package.
Take a look in the wiki about centos it has the information about it.
Eliezer
On 10/05/2014 07:23 PM, Rafael Akchurin wrote:
> Hello Eliez
still trying to get this working. To eliminate the self signed certificate
issue, I got a official signed certificate from Starfield Tech. LLC.
They've sent two certifcates but I'm unsure how to use these certificates
since the ssl_bump parameters only have one certificate as a parameter
On Sun,
Rafael Akchurin wrote:
> I believe I do (but you made me doubt:)
>
Well, I have tried negotiate_kerberos_auth with Firefox (Windows) and
they don't work together. I am attaching a packet dump which boils
down basically to the following:
1. proxy.sibptus.transneft.ru:3131 is configured in Firefox
And before I forget and before somebody asks. In Firefox:
network.negotiate-auth.allow-proxies=true
network.negotiate-auth.gsslib=""
network.negotiate-auth.using-native-gsslib=true
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Rafael Akchurin wrote:
> > I believe I do (but you made me doubt:)
> >
>
> Well, I have tr
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Rafael Akchurin wrote:
> > I believe I do (but you made me doubt:)
> >
>
> Well, I have tried negotiate_kerberos_auth with Firefox (Windows)
I have tried the same with MSIE 8 (Windows).
It's obviously trying to do NTLM instead of Kerberos (see below). How
do I enable Ke
17 matches
Mail list logo
