Hi,
thx,
if I change this:
http_port 127.0.0.1:3128
http_port 192.168.15.2:3129 intercept
to this:
http_port 192.168.15.2:3129
then its working
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 15/02/2015 12:19 p.m., naser sonbaty wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > thx for support.
> >
> > I fo
On 15/02/2015 12:19 p.m., naser sonbaty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thx for support.
>
> I found second running squid on same box. I shut-down the second squid.
> But the problems are not gone..
>
> Sorry I don't have access to the router pc :-( I can not get the rule
>
> I have set up web browse
Hi,
thx for support.
I found second running squid on same box. I shut-down the second squid.
But the problems are not gone..
Sorry I don't have access to the router pc :-( I can not get the rule
I have set up web browsers to use direct squid with 3129.
But the result its same.
I found
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can to reproduce this with trace at Monday. My users uses that.
15.02.15 3:46, Amos Jeffries пишет:
> On 15/02/2015 9:26 a.m., Jason Haar wrote:
>> But this is just a hack around a problem isn't it?
>
> Yes.
>
>> ie why can't squid successfully i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/02/2015 9:26 a.m., Jason Haar wrote:
> But this is just a hack around a problem isn't it?
Yes.
> ie why can't squid successfully intercept 20M+ transfers from this
> website?
Well, Squid *is* intercepting them. Its what happens after that is
g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yep. This is dirty hack.:)
But I guess this is site-specific limitations. Besides the fact that
the bump does not work with attachments to many Webmail services and
clouds.
I think, this is because mail.ru uses cloud as backend of mail
attachments. W
But this is just a hack around a problem isn't it? ie why can't squid
successfully intercept 20M+ transfers from this website? I guess it's
working for 1byte-10M transactions, so why not 20M?
Jason
On 14/02/15 23:22, Yuri Voinov wrote:
> No problem. ;)
>
> 100 ip's is no problem. If they in one
On 15/02/2015 8:25 a.m., snakeeyes wrote:
> Hi Amos ,
>
> Shoudnt the user tested is the user that I gave him the grant ???
The 'user' who got a SQL "GRANT" is the software user whch is allowed to
acccess the DB contents. That should only be Squid and/or your sysadmin
who changes users records.
On 12.02.2015, at 17:58, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 13/02/2015 5:41 a.m., Simon Stäheli wrote:
hmh, HAVE_KRB5 seems not to be set in include/autoconf.h
What is the correct way to provide squid the path to the kerberos header
files?
./configure —help doesn’t show a useful option as --with-k
Hi Ludovit,
Yes the client determines the encryption strength and squid needs to have
all of them in the keytab (You can disallow DES or other weak encryption by
not adding these encryptions to the keytab).
Regards
Markus
"Ludovit Koren" wrote in message news:86lhk0j2xe@gmail.com...
Yes! No problem;) Thank you!!!
On Feb 14, 2015 1:22 PM, "Yuri Voinov" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> No problem. ;)
>
> 100 ip's is no problem. If they in one subnet, you can pass only this
> sublet with one row in acl. Overall *.mail.ru is much more networks,
> so 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No problem. ;)
100 ip's is no problem. If they in one subnet, you can pass only this
sublet with one row in acl. Overall *.mail.ru is much more networks,
so 100 ip's no matter. ;) But bumping remains can give your better hit
rate.
14.02.15 16:20, Di
Now i can upload, after adding ip addresses from my previous message to
ssl_bump none acl.
Thank you.
On Feb 14, 2015 1:15 PM, "Yuri Voinov" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I.e, you want to say you cannot upload file above 25 megabytes?
>
> 14.02.15 12:55, Dima Ermako
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I.e, you want to say you cannot upload file above 25 megabytes?
14.02.15 12:55, Dima Ermakov пишет:
> I think, that it's not good solution too, but
> uploadXXX.files.mail.ru has about 100 servers.
>
> Now i write small script on python, that creates
Hi Amos ,
Shoudnt the user tested is the user that I gave him the grant ???
I mean I gave grant for user/pwd ==>squid/squid
Now how to test it ?
Shoudnt I test with squid/squid ?? or test with user in db ???
I mean I used :
/lib/squid/basic_db_auth --dsn "DBI:mysql:database=squid:xx189.177" --
On 14/02/2015 6:13 p.m., Priya Agarwal wrote:
>
> I had also set the permission of '/usr ' to nobody. I can reboot my system
> with the default permissions if I have screwd up my system way too much. If
Okay. Do that.
Then let me know what the output is from:
ls -la /var
ls -la /var/logs
> Markus Moeller writes:
> It could be the new AD server is setup to be backward compatible
> meaning it use RC4 despite being able to use AES. I suggest you crate
> an additional keytab entry for RC4. How did you create the keytab ?
Now it seems to work:
# /usr/local/libex
17 matches
Mail list logo
