Re: [squid-users] cpu high 100%

speeds of ? i did not mention speeds bandwith ? is 25Meg or cpu speed i post that on previus msg detail of my server on clients side is full open speed no Queues -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cpu-high-100-tp4672918p4672961.html Sent

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

Hi Amos, I see the new build squid-3.5.7-20150829-r13899 released taking care the cache_swap_high, does this build apply the limit with the "Filemap bits in use" or is it on the cache "Percent Used" only ? Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

On 30/08/2015 9:02 p.m., FredT wrote: > Hi Amos, > I see the new build squid-3.5.7-20150829-r13899 released taking care the > cache_swap_high, does this build apply the limit with the "Filemap bits in > use" or is it on the cache "Percent Used" only ? Just the bug fix, which was about the volume b

Re: [squid-users] Building squid | Best Practices?

On 30/08/2015 1:07 p.m., Howard Waterfall wrote: > Great stuff thanks a lot! Excellent timing too just getting ready to do the > make. I'll follow your suggestions. A couple of follow ups: > > When doing the make (including ./configure), do I have to be running as > root or some particular user? I

Re: [squid-users] High-Availability in Squid

On 30/08/2015 3:58 p.m., Ashish Mukherjee wrote: > Why should Squid take care of HA though? Isn't it the responsibility of the > Website to ensure its uptime? Even if used as a reverse proxy, Apache may > do a better job at this, since one can do more sophisticated configurations > with mod_proxy.

Re: [squid-users] Please help me , about none HTTP protocol (DPORT 80)

On 30/08/2015 1:10 p.m., 贾凡 wrote: > Please help me , about none HTTP protocol (DPORT 80) . > > I installed a SQUID (3.5) on Centos 6.5 as a web & video caching system > .(not reverse proxy or cache ) > I use the TPROXY method following here: > >

Re: [squid-users] Internet Explorer error with SSL bumping

On 29/08/2015 12:17 a.m., Oliver Webb wrote: > Thanks for your reply Amos. I will explain a bit more of my setup in the hope > it clarifies a few of the issues. > > I have installed the certificate portion of squids key/cert into the trusted > root store of all the devices concerned all clients

Re: [squid-users] logfileHandleWrite: daemon:/var/logs/access.log: error writing ((32) Broken pipe)

Resolved; well sort of! I've been setting up log file permissions to jibe with the *cache_effective_user* tag in /etc/squid3/squid.conf, which I had set to squid. As I was troubleshooting, I also changed the *http_port* tag from 8080, but I noticed the output when I tried starting squid remained 8

Re: [squid-users] Building squid | Best Practices?

+squid-users Thanks again, this is valuable information! As you may have guessed, I'm asking about the user that should do builds to ensure that the build outputs are created with the appropriate permissions - I get a little concerned about security. It sounds like you are suggesting that I simpl

Re: [squid-users] Internet Explorer error with SSL bumping

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 30.08.15 21:52, Amos Jeffries пишет: > On 29/08/2015 12:17 a.m., Oliver Webb wrote: >> Thanks for your reply Amos. I will explain a bit more of my setup in the hope it clarifies a few of the issues. >> >> I have installed the certificate portion

Re: [squid-users] Building squid | Best Practices?

Hello Howard, This is how we rebuild default Squid 3.3.8 in Ubuntu 14.01 to enable HTTPS filtering - http://docs.diladele.com/administrator_guide_4_2/installation_and_removal/ubuntu14/squid.html Hope the scripts can be easily adapted to build the latest Squid instead of the stock one. Best reg

Re: [squid-users] Using Squid as forward http proxy failing to complete request?

Amos thanks. I was sick over the weekend thus the late reply Sorry by mistake I left out the mailing-list email on previously mail. I would look into the donation link and see how I can tribute :). Bug:) that was unexpected. I thought it was routine debugging work. Here is output of squid -v "

Re: [squid-users] High-Availability in Squid

Hi, Agree that Squid is a specialized proxy and more optimal architecture for the purpose and trying to achieve HA on the Browser side is certainly a bad idea. Talking specifically of a reverse proxy scenario, whether one uses Squid or Apache mod_proxy or something else may well depend upon what