Re: [squid-users] build error with kernel headers 4.2

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:24:10AM +, Eray Aslan wrote: > I am getting a bunch of build errors with kernel headers 4.2: Nevermind, found bug #4323. Sorry for the noise. -- Eray ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://

[squid-users] build error with kernel headers 4.2

I am getting a bunch of build errors with kernel headers 4.2: libtool: compile: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -I../../include -I../../lib -I../../src -I../../include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wcomments -Wshadow -pipe -D_REENTRANT -m64 -march=native -O2 -pipe -std=c+

Re: [squid-users] Optimezed???

On 17/09/2015 8:55 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > Try to run this on you access.log: > cat /var/log/squid/access.log|gawk '{print $4}'|sort|uniq -c > > This should show a list of all the cases which includes 304 status code. > If you can post the results there will might be another side to the >

Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to send the connection, starting with the CONNECT, to cache-peer?

On 17/09/2015 4:36 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: > > Hm. > > If I understand correctly, the right configuration must be: > > # Privoxy+Tor access rules > never_direct allow CONNECT > never_direct allow tor_url > > # Local Privoxy is cache parent > cache_peer 127.0.0.1 parent 8118 0 no-query no-diges

Re: [squid-users] high volume of 'missing files' in cache....TCP_SWAPFAIL

Please Amos, this is a bug in 3.5.x in 3.4.x this problem is not exist, and i goes back to 3.4 just because of swapfail and losing a lot of data .. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/high-volume-of-missing-files-in-cache-TCP-SWAPFAIL-tp4673203p4

Re: [squid-users] Optimezed???

Try to run this on you access.log: cat /var/log/squid/access.log|gawk '{print $4}'|sort|uniq -c This should show a list of all the cases which includes 304 status code. If you can post the results there will might be another side to the whole story in the output. Eliezer On 16/09/2015 23:51,

Re: [squid-users] Optimezed???

Any suggestions? Em 16/09/2015 17:10, "Eliezer Croitoru" escreveu: > Can you run a script on the access log? to verify couple things? > Hit and Miss are not the only options and there is a possibility that your > cache causes that only specific requests will be even downloaded using the > cache.

Re: [squid-users] Optimezed???

Can you run a script on the access log? to verify couple things? Hit and Miss are not the only options and there is a possibility that your cache causes that only specific requests will be even downloaded using the cache. If so I will send you the bash script to try and see something. Eliezer

Re: [squid-users] Optimezed???

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Deadly horrible. It would be better if it did not exist. 17.09.15 2:00, Jorgeley Junior пишет: > I think my squid is not optimezed due the percentage of hits, see the graph > bellow: > > ​ > > > > ___ >

Re: [squid-users] Optimezed???

On Wednesday 16 September 2015 at 22:00:27, Jorgeley Junior wrote: > I think my squid is not optimezed due the percentage of hits, see the graph > bellow: I agree with you. Regards, Antony. -- +++ Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot +++

[squid-users] Optimezed???

I think my squid is not optimezed due the percentage of hits, see the graph bellow: ​ ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to send the connection, starting with the CONNECT, to cache-peer?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hm. If I understand correctly, the right configuration must be: # Privoxy+Tor access rules never_direct allow CONNECT never_direct allow tor_url # Local Privoxy is cache parent cache_peer 127.0.0.1 parent 8118 0 no-query no-digest default cache

Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to send the connection, starting with the CONNECT, to cache-peer?

On 17/09/2015 3:42 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: > > Sure. > > I've tried all possible combinations. > Including this: > > # SSL bump rules > sslproxy_cert_error allow all > acl DiscoverSNIHost at_step SslBump1 > ssl_bump peek DiscoverSNIHost > acl NoSSLIntercept ssl::server_name_regex -i localhost \

Re: [squid-users] after changed from 3.4.13 to 3.5.8 sslbump doesn't work for the site https://banking.postbank.de/

On 17/09/2015 3:16 a.m., Dieter Bloms wrote: > Hello Antony, > > > On Wed, Sep 16, Antony Stone wrote: > >> On Wednesday 16 September 2015 at 15:39:35, Dieter Bloms wrote: >> >>> I did an upgrade of my squid from 3.4.13 to 3.5.8 and most sites are >>> accessible via HTTPS and sslbump enable. >>>

Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to send the connection, starting with the CONNECT, to cache-peer?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 16.09.15 21:34, Amos Jeffries пишет: > On 17/09/2015 3:18 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: >> >> This: >> >> http://osdir.com/ml/web.squid.general/2003-04/msg00800.html >> >> does not work. > > Do you have always_direct rules that match the request(s)? I

Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to send the connection, starting with the CONNECT, to cache-peer?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sure. I've tried all possible combinations. Including this: # SSL bump rules sslproxy_cert_error allow all acl DiscoverSNIHost at_step SslBump1 ssl_bump peek DiscoverSNIHost acl NoSSLIntercept ssl::server_name_regex -i localhost \.icq\.* ssl_bump

Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to send the connection, starting with the CONNECT, to cache-peer?

On 17/09/2015 3:18 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: > > This: > > http://osdir.com/ml/web.squid.general/2003-04/msg00800.html > > does not work. Do you have always_direct rules that match the request(s)? or "nonhierarchical_direct on" ? The order of invocation is: nonhierarchical_direct (on means d

Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to send the connection, starting with the CONNECT, to cache-peer?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 This: http://osdir.com/ml/web.squid.general/2003-04/msg00800.html does not work. 16.09.15 0:15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas пишет: > On 15.09.15 23:42, Yuri Voinov wrote: >> I asked a specific question. How does Squid as a whole - I am well >> aware.

Re: [squid-users] after changed from 3.4.13 to 3.5.8 sslbump doesn't work for the site https://banking.postbank.de/

Hello Antony, On Wed, Sep 16, Antony Stone wrote: > On Wednesday 16 September 2015 at 15:39:35, Dieter Bloms wrote: > > > I did an upgrade of my squid from 3.4.13 to 3.5.8 and most sites are > > accessible via HTTPS and sslbump enable. > > But I can't get any access to the destination > > https

Re: [squid-users] help with acl order and deny_info pages

On 17/09/2015 12:37 a.m., Marko Cupać wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to setup squid in a way that it authenticates users via > kerberos and grants different levels of web access according to ldap > query of MS AD groups.After some trials and errors I have found acl > order which apparently does not t

Re: [squid-users] after changed from 3.4.13 to 3.5.8 sslbump doesn't work for the site https://banking.postbank.de/

On Wednesday 16 September 2015 at 15:39:35, Dieter Bloms wrote: > I did an upgrade of my squid from 3.4.13 to 3.5.8 and most sites are > accessible via HTTPS and sslbump enable. > But I can't get any access to the destination > https://banking.postbank.de, which is accessible with 3.4.13. > I use

[squid-users] after changed from 3.4.13 to 3.5.8 sslbump doesn't work for the site https://banking.postbank.de/

Hello, I did an upgrade of my squid from 3.4.13 to 3.5.8 and most sites are accessible via HTTPS and sslbump enable. But I can't get any access to the destination https://banking.postbank.de, which is accessible with 3.4.13. I use the same config for both squid versions. Can anybody with enabled

[squid-users] help with acl order and deny_info pages

Hi, I'm trying to setup squid in a way that it authenticates users via kerberos and grants different levels of web access according to ldap query of MS AD groups.After some trials and errors I have found acl order which apparently does not trigger reauthentication (auth dialogues in browsers altho

Re: [squid-users] problem with ntlm_smb_lm_auth helper

On 16/09/2015 9:05 p.m., Emmanuel Garette wrote: > Le 07/09/2015 18:40, Amos Jeffries a écrit : >> On 8/09/2015 1:17 a.m., Emmanuel Garette wrote: >>> >>> Seems to be ok for me. Thanks for your fast reply. >>> >>> Need I open a bug in bugzilla ? >>> >> No need. I think this may be one of the existi

Re: [squid-users] problem with ntlm_smb_lm_auth helper

Le 16/09/2015 11:05, Emmanuel Garette a écrit : > Le 07/09/2015 18:40, Amos Jeffries a écrit : >> On 8/09/2015 1:17 a.m., Emmanuel Garette wrote: >>> Seems to be ok for me. Thanks for your fast reply. >>> >>> Need I open a bug in bugzilla ? >>> >> No need. I think this may be one of the existing on

Re: [squid-users] problem with ntlm_smb_lm_auth helper

Le 07/09/2015 18:40, Amos Jeffries a écrit : > On 8/09/2015 1:17 a.m., Emmanuel Garette wrote: >> >> Seems to be ok for me. Thanks for your fast reply. >> >> Need I open a bug in bugzilla ? >> > No need. I think this may be one of the existing ones about this helper. > Thanks for the feedback it sh

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraries/CDNs Booster

Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.633 - September 16th 2015. - New domains More details on https://svb.unveiltech.com Enjoy Bye F