Re: [squid-users] Squid Websocket Issue

2017-01-01 Thread Hardik Dangar
@amos or anyone else from dev team Can you confirm this is intentional behavior or bug ? On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Alex Rousskov < rouss...@measurement-factory.com> wrote: > On 12/27/2016 04:50 AM, Hardik Dangar wrote: > > > If i remove !serverIsws somehow websockets will not work. > >

Re: [squid-users] acls with the same name, last wins

2017-01-01 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 12/29/2016 10:44 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > The intended design for ACLs is that basic/primitive tests check one > piece of state data and get chained explicitly in the access lines for > AND/OR conditions. That way it is clear what is being processed and > matched (or not matched). The

Re: [squid-users] Squid Websocket Issue

2017-01-01 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 12/27/2016 04:50 AM, Hardik Dangar wrote: > If i remove !serverIsws somehow websockets will not work. Then there is a bug somewhere AFAICT. It is your call whether to find out what that bug is [while continuing to use a potentially dangerous workaround]. Alex. > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at

Re: [squid-users] squid 4.0.17 accept-encoding.. sending gzip?!

2017-01-01 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 12/27/2016 06:13 AM, Heiler Bemerguy wrote: > Why is squid compressing it Squid does not compress because Squid does not have the code to compress. To understand what it going on, you need to find the agent that does compression. It could be the origin server, an ICAP service, an eCAP