Hi,
When I exclude some sites (like banks) with ssl_bump peek/splice that
works well, Got a new problem that
sites (that I exclude) can not be blocked using Url_Rewrite.
I use Url_rewrite to block sites based on User IP and all all other
sites(no in exclude list) it working very well.
How
Hi,
>
> In my environment I have deployed two KVM hypervisors. I'd like to deploy
> in my DMZ a squid proxy host in order to hide hypervisor IPs and Ports
from
> the clients.
Why? What's the problem with the clients knowing the true values?
--> I want to publis VDI Desktops through Internet.
On Sunday 19 February 2017 at 19:05:57, Oscar Segarra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my environment I have deployed two KVM hypervisors. I'd like to deploy
> in my DMZ a squid proxy host in order to hide hypervisor IPs and Ports from
> the clients.
Why? What's the problem with the clients knowing the
Side note...
no_cache is not flagged as an error in 3.5.24.
If it is misconfigured you will get a notice though. It seems to be
treated as a legit alias.
Senor
On 2/7/2017 20:40, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 8/02/2017 12:50 a.m., Jude Karuhanga wrote:
>> Hello there,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.
Hi,
In my environment I have deployed two KVM hypervisors. I'd like tu deploy
in my DMZ a squid proxy host in order to hide hypervisor IPs and Ports from
the clients.
Each virtual machine has a unique port but VMs can run on any hypervisor.
Is ist possible to achieve this with squid?
Is there
What is the content of: /etc/squid/exfiles.conf
And did you tried using:
ssl::server_name_regex -i "/etc/squid/doms.nobump"
/etc/squid/doms.nobump:
##START OF FILE
update\.microsoft\.com$
update\.microsoft\.com\.akadns\.net$
v10\.vortex\-win\.data\.microsoft.com$
Hi,
When I try to exclude some sites like Banks (or even gmail.com) for
users using squid in TRANSPARENT Mode,
I get in Squid log : "SECURITY ALERT: On URL..." (all servers and
users using same dns, so this not an issue).
My config file regard to this:
acl step1 at_step SslBump1
acl
On 18/02/2017 3:18 a.m., Heiler Bemerguy wrote:
>
> Em 17/02/2017 09:44, Amos Jeffries escreveu:
>> On 16/02/2017 10:40 a.m., Heiler Bemerguy wrote:
>>> Is it normal, on every restart?
>>>
>> Well, this is a check that is only performed on restart. So in a way it
>> is "normal" that it occurs on
