I'd like to set up a proxy on a home server so I can use it remotely for web
browsing; no filtering, nothing fancy, just a pass-through of sorts to get
around web filters. That part I've got working. The part I haven't had luck
with is encrypting the browser-to-proxy connection. I've found
I packaged the helper\service for CentOS 7 at:
http://ngtech.co.il/repo/centos/7/x86_64/ytgv-predictor-icap-0.0.1-5.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
And the StoreID helper at:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/StoreID/PredictionAssitenedHelper
with some squid.conf example.
Now, if you don't understand
On Tuesday 23 May 2017 at 21:05:38, erdosain9 wrote:
> thanks and sorry, i have just two.
> In one of them (the more "important") i have SSO, and in the other i have
> access per ip.
> So, i need to have the two squid servers equally or not?
You configure the one the clients point to for SSO
On 05/23/2017 12:34 PM, Garbacik, Joe wrote:
> I am trying to separate logs so that in the log entries define why it
> was blocked. For example, I have created [one custom log format for each
> blocking rule]. If there a better way to accomplish this?
Yes, please see this very recent discussion:
thanks and sorry, i have just two.
In one of them (the more "important") i have SSO, and in the other i have
access per ip.
So, i need to have the two squid servers equally or not?
In the other hand I do not mind the use of bandwidth but serve as fast as
possible.
how i would config this??
I am trying to separate logs so that in the log entries define why it was
blocked. For example, I have created the following log formats:
logformat MyAllowSuccessLog local_time="[%tl]" action=ALLOW status=SUCCESS **
orig_src_ip=%{X-Forwarded-For}>h proxy_src_ip=%>a proxy_src_port=%>p
On Tuesday 23 May 2017 at 19:19:13, erdosain9 wrote:
> Hi.
> I have working a squid server. we have 110 pc.
> I have two virtualized squids.
> One of them is working, and the other i use for testing purpose.
So, do you have two Squid instances, or three, in total?
> i want to know if i could
Hi.
I have working a squid server. we have 110 pc.
I have two virtualized squids.
One of them is working, and the other i use for testing purpose. but, i want
to know if i could take that of "testing purpose" and put to work with
"cache peers or neighbors"??
It would be better?? it give some
Hi Amos,
Thanks for your reply.
What I mean is that so far I only used squid_db_auth and it works great but
now I have a need to allow certain IPs on top of allowing users.
Since the IPs are not constant, I need a way to handle the allowed IPs
dynamically.
As for the amount of traffic, there
--delete-after delete files locally after
downloading them
I know this by simple execution wget --help :-D
Feel free to do RTFM :-D
23.05.2017 5:39, George Diaz пишет:
Hi
sorry this off-topic question ...
I want pre-cache some object from some interest host with wget.
Hi,
I know I have an "old" version of Squid (3.5.14), but I'd like to know if the
issue I'm seeing has been fixed in newer versions before I upgrade.
I can't easily reproduce the failure. The Squid process uses a c-icap module to
scan content (squidclamav).
It's all fine, in general, but at
Hi Amos and others.
Its not a "samba" thing or a squid thing.
Maybe in the end yes, but this is a configuration thing.
For you guys to know, samba AD DC setup this parameter as default :
ldap server require strong auth = yes
Which obligates the use of TLS.
Next, users dont configure
12 matches
Mail list logo
