Re: [squid-users] Introducing Charcoal - Centralised URL Filter for squid

2017-06-16 Thread Nishant Sharma
Hi Eliezer, On 14 June 2017 11:07:16 PM IST, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >I want to offer you a more advanced helper that supports actual >concurrency compared to the current perl helper on github, >which understands the protocol but do not use threads or any other >method of concurrency. > >Let

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 06/16/2017 06:22 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> Alex Rousskov wrote: AFAIK, there are currently no plans (or even strong demand) to support active FTP mode between Squid and FTP origin servers. >> On 16/06/17 22:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> what is ftp_passive for then

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 16/06/17 23:57, javier perez wrote: They could open just a range of 5 dinamic ports and monitor them intensively... I take it by "they" you mean the passive attacker? the server may open any of (2^N) * (2^15) ports, where N is the number of IPs assigned to the server both IPv4 and IPv6. A

[squid-users] Squid 3.5.26 and 4.0.20 RPM's avaliable

2017-06-16 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
First something nice for the weekend: http://geekshumor.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/You-said-I-should-spend.gif And: I am happy to release the RPM's for Squid-Cache versions: 3.5.26 and 4.0.20. The RPM's included are for: CentOS 6+7, RHEL 7, SLES 12, Oracle Enterprise Linux 6+7. I have also r

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Citing: AFAIK, there are currently no plans (or even strong demand) to support active FTP mode between Squid and FTP origin servers. On 16/06/17 22:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: what is ftp_passive for then? On 16.06.17 23:49, Amos Jeffries wrote: For controlling how Squid gateways "G

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread javier perez
They could open just a range of 5 dinamic ports and monitor them intensively... > Hello Matus, > > You are right, the thing is that our clients are not going to open any > other port than 20 and 21 for security meassures (or lazyness). FYI: The "for security" argument is bogus because; a) allo

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread javier perez
Yes!! I was wondering wtf is this xD!! I will check FROX, and ty again! Regards On 16/06/17 23:26, javier perez wrote: > Thank you very much Amos for your suggestion, I'm gonna study it > straight away. > Ouch. Sorry I thought one thing and typed another. What I meant to suggest was FROX and

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 16/06/17 18:33, javier perez wrote: Hello Matus, You are right, the thing is that our clients are not going to open any other port than 20 and 21 for security meassures (or lazyness). FYI: The "for security" argument is bogus because; a) allowing any random client to determine their own a

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 16/06/17 23:26, javier perez wrote: Thank you very much Amos for your suggestion, I'm gonna study it straight away. Ouch. Sorry I thought one thing and typed another. What I meant to suggest was FROX and similar. FoxyProxy is the browser integration thing for proxying.

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 16/06/17 22:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/www/squid/archive/3.5/squid-3.5.0.1-RELEASENOTES.html " Active and passive FTP support on the user-facing side; require passive connections to come from the control connection source IP address." On 06/15/2017 09:5

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread javier perez
Thank you very much Amos for your suggestion, I'm gonna study it straight away. Regards! On 16/06/17 18:42, javier perez wrote: > Hi Alex, > > I totally understand it

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/www/squid/archive/3.5/squid-3.5.0.1-RELEASENOTES.html " Active and passive FTP support on the user-facing side; require passive connections to come from the control connection source IP address." On 06/15/2017 09:55 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: that means, if y

Re: [squid-users] RV: squid

2017-06-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 16/06/17 18:42, javier perez wrote: Hi Alex, I totally understand it, and I know that active ftp is being deprecated, so It's logic that no further development It's gonna take place. That reason just makes it unlikely, not impossible. Squid being FOSS anyone can contribute patches at any t

Re: [squid-users] Squid Transparent HTTP Proxy - 2 ETH Links - HTTP Proxy

2017-06-16 Thread Norbert Naveen
Hello Eliezer, Switch - Cisco 3750 Did not understand the " mirror all traffic to the probe node." Thanks Naveen -Original Message- From: Eliezer Croitoru [mailto:elie...@ngtech.co.il] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 7:28 PM To: norbert.nav...@tayana.in Cc: squid-users@lists.squid-cac