Hi, and thanks.
Maybe i dont explain well.
I just want this:
WanRouter---Squid-switch--PC
I want to declare in "PC" IP, MASK, AND GATEWAY, instead of the WanRouter, i
want that PC have for gateway the ip of the Squid.
I do this by now.
sudo iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -s 192.
Feel free to take a look inside wiki:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/InterceptionProxy
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept
11.07.2017 19:35, erdosain9 пишет:
> Hi, and thanks.
> Maybe i dont explain well.
> I just want this:
>
> WanRouter---Squid-switch--
Hi to all.
Im having this warning
2017/07/11 11:37:44 kid1| WARNING: Disk space over limit: 17241692.00 KB >
1536 KB
2017/07/11 11:37:56 kid1| WARNING: Disk space over limit: 16800692.00 KB >
1536 KB
2017/07/11 11:38:07 kid1| WARNING: Disk space over limit: 16466860.00 KB >
1536 KB
201
Thanks
Yes, im looking the wiki and follow this
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/LinuxDnat
And, it is not working. Nothing it is going to squid.
I can go to internet because
# Controls IP packet forwarding
net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
but, nothing throug squid.
What can be? Ano
Squid should be configured and built with interception support.
Re-read more carefully.
11.07.2017 21:26, erdosain9 пишет:
> Thanks
> Yes, im looking the wiki and follow this
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/LinuxDnat
>
> And, it is not working. Nothing it is going to squid.
Ok Yuri, im re re re reading... :-)
And probe another configs, like this
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/LinuxRedirect
and nothing, i dont get where i fail.
Squid, it is config in interception mode.
cache.log
2017/07/11 14:15:43 kid1| Accepting HTTP Socket connections
On 07/10/2017 05:52 PM, avi_h wrote:
> I'm trying to get squid to use the same headers as it received (to make it
> more transparent)
To improve your chances of arriving at a usable solution (or quickly
abandoning a futile search), I suggest detailing/narrowing your goal:
"Make it more transpare
May be this will be of any help -
https://docs.diladele.com/tutorials/transparent_proxy_ubuntu/index.html
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of erdosain9
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 5:41 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache
As Alex mentioned its not possible to do with squid. I modified the squid
source code to do this a month ago. Its not hard to do, you will only need
to modify http.cc and client_side.cc a bit.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Alex Rousskov <
rouss...@measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> On 07/10/201
Hi Alex,
Thanks for this.
I can narrow it down, as you mentioned, I want to configure Squid to make
some server(s) think that the
request is coming directly from a user agent (e.g., browser).
However, I don't know what those servers use to detect proxies, any idea on
how I can figure it out?
Idea
On 07/11/2017 01:00 PM, avi_h wrote:
> I want to configure Squid to make some server(s) think that the
> request is coming directly from a user agent (e.g., browser).
> However, I don't know what those servers use to detect proxies,
Understood. We are still where we used to be then: Without a kn
Hey,
If you are using a single process ie not SMP(default) use aufs instead of diskd
cache_dir.
It's much more stable and efficient then diskd(to my knowledge).
Eliezer
Eliezer Croitoru
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
-Original Message-
12.07.2017 3:25, Eliezer Croitoru пишет:
> Hey,
>
> If you are using a single process ie not SMP(default) use aufs instead of
> diskd cache_dir.
> It's much more stable and efficient then diskd(to my knowledge).
Not sure about you knowledge. Diskd is simple designed for another OS
than Linux. On
12.07.2017 4:34, Yuri пишет:
>
> 12.07.2017 3:25, Eliezer Croitoru пишет:
>> Hey,
>>
>> If you are using a single process ie not SMP(default) use aufs instead of
>> diskd cache_dir.
>> It's much more stable and efficient then diskd(to my knowledge).
> Not sure about you knowledge. Diskd is simpl
On 12/07/17 10:34, Yuri wrote:
12.07.2017 3:25, Eliezer Croitoru пишет:
Hey,
If you are using a single process ie not SMP(default) use aufs instead of diskd
cache_dir.
It's much more stable and efficient then diskd(to my knowledge).
>
Not sure about you knowledge. Diskd is simple designed
15 matches
Mail list logo