Re: [squid-users] Squid box for two networks

On Monday 17 July 2017 at 21:31:50, Pablo Ruben Maldonado wrote: > Hello, I have a squid box 3.5 working without problems for the lan > 192.168.110.0/24 for several months. Now I want setup to another lan > 192.168.115.0/24 but I cannot. Tcpdump inform me that the packages come to > squid box. But

Re: [squid-users] youtube videos and squid

Hey Sergei, Thanks for sharing. This is the first time I have seen EMBY server and client and it seems pretty decent\good and contains many very nice features. I have been working on a solution that will be hosted on a Linux Server which I named "YouTube-Store". It's working and I wrote install

Re: [squid-users] Squid box for two networks

Hello, Hello, I have a squid box 3.5 working without problems for the lan 192.168.110.0/24 for several months. Now I want setup to another lan 192.168.115.0/24 but I cannot. Tcpdump inform me that the packages come to squid box. But in Squid'

[squid-users] Squid box for two networks

Hello, I have a squid box 3.5 working without problems for the lan 192.168.110.0/24 for several months. Now I want setup to another lan 192.168.115.0/24 but I cannot. Tcpdump inform me that the packages come to squid box. But in Squid's log I do not see anything. Can they give me some tip?

Re: [squid-users] youtube videos and squid

Thank you for saving me time and effort. I ended up following advice of downloading youtube movies to home computer and serving from it. My choice was EMBY server for windows https://emby.media/windows-server.html although a couple others were good options as well. I bought Emby app for iPad and

Re: [squid-users] What would be the maximum ufs\aufs cache_dir objects?

So basically from I understand the limit of the AUFS\UFS cache_dir is at: 16,777,215 Objects. So for a very loaded system it might be pretty "small". I have asked since: I have seen the mongodb ecap adapter that stores chunks and I didn't liked it. In the other way I wrote a cache_dir in GoLang wh

Re: [squid-users] HDD/RAM Capacity vs store_avg_object_size

Thank you Amos, OK so how can I accurately measure the memory usage? Kind Regards, - Bug Reporter Contributor OpenSource = Open-Minded -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/HDD-RAM-Capacity-vs-store-avg-object-size-tp4683072p4683116.html Sent

Re: [squid-users] HDD/RAM Capacity vs store_avg_object_size

On 18/07/17 00:01, bugreporter wrote: Hi, Thank you for this clarification. Can you please tell me what is the best method to measure the RAM used by Squid? Can I trust *top* and/or *ps* and look at the RSS? Or you suggest another method (maybe using the manager)? For instance on a 64x when I s

Re: [squid-users] HDD/RAM Capacity vs store_avg_object_size

Hi, Thank you for this clarification. Can you please tell me what is the best method to measure the RAM used by Squid? Can I trust *top* and/or *ps* and look at the RSS? Or you suggest another method (maybe using the manager)? For instance on a 64x when I start squid without cache_dir and a cache