[squid-users] Access to different groups SQuid3

2018-03-21 Thread Edwin Quijada
Hi! I am a newbie using SQUID and I have a question : I have 4 different groups in my company each group has access different but I dont know how create an ACL to give access for each group. These groups and users are in a mysql database in the same box is SQUID3. How can I create this ACL to

[squid-users] Squid 4 EL6 RPMs

2018-03-21 Thread Dan Charlesworth
Hello all, I'm wondering if anyone can point to a Squid 4 RPM package for CentOS / RHEL 6. I've had a search around, but it seems people are only packaging it for EL7. I did try compiling an EL6 RPM myself, based on an EL7 source RPM, but I'm not adept in this area and couldn't get past certain

[squid-users] unsubscribe

2018-03-21 Thread Jason Zions
unsubscribe ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Re: [squid-users] Possible Bug? "parameters()" syntax in acl dstdomain results in rule not working?

2018-03-21 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 03/21/2018 11:45 AM, p...@thepottshouse.org wrote: > Hello, > > I am running squid 3.5.23 on Debian 9. My goal was to try to set up a > simple proxy server for whitelisting. > > It's working now, but I had some difficulty. In the release notes I came > across this example: > >

[squid-users] Possible Bug? "parameters()" syntax in acl dstdomain results in rule not working?

2018-03-21 Thread paul
Hello, I am running squid 3.5.23 on Debian 9. My goal was to try to set up a simple proxy server for whitelisting. It's working now, but I had some difficulty. In the release notes I came across this example: http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.5/squid-3.5.23-RELEASENOTES.html#s3 It shows

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-21 Thread Yuri
Use OS performance tools. Require to identify bottleneck. Pay attention on wait events. 21.03.2018 20:05, FredB пишет: > I agree, to be honest I started with low values updated again and again, I > should have post my previous tests rather than the latest :) > > >

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-21 Thread FredB
I agree, to be honest I started with low values updated again and again, I should have post my previous tests rather than the latest :) ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-21 Thread Yuri
Aha, this is better. So, next step should be detailed performance statistics to identify bottleneck. As I've said - check wait events first. 21.03.2018 19:23, FredB пишет: > Sorry, it was just a wrong cut/paste cache_size=50MB the previous result > still the same > About children I tried with

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-21 Thread FredB
Sorry, it was just a wrong cut/paste cache_size=50MB the previous result still the same About children I tried with 256, unfortunately squid is still stuck at 100% Regards Fred ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-21 Thread Yuri
Finally. Premature optimization is the root of all evils. Never start new setups from your assumptions only. Set good enough starting values and monitor. Increase only if required. And, pls, don't think all performance problems can solves with giant RAM. It does not matter how big your RAM is.

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-21 Thread Yuri
21.03.2018 14:55, FredB пишет: >>> Perhaps I should retry SMP but unfortunately in the past I had many >>> issues with, and some features I'm using still SMP-unaware >> Squid's SMP itself does not solves SSL Bump issues. It's about >> different >> things, and, IMHO, irrelevant your load profile.

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-21 Thread FredB
> > Perhaps I should retry SMP but unfortunately in the past I had many > > issues with, and some features I'm using still SMP-unaware > Squid's SMP itself does not solves SSL Bump issues. It's about > different > things, and, IMHO, irrelevant your load profile. I'm thinking about that, because