Re: [squid-users] [ext] Re: Absolute upper limit for filedescriptors in squid-6?

Thansk Amos, Is using epoll root@artica-postfix:~# squidclient -h 127.0.0.1 -p 56500 mgr:menu | grep comm_incoming stub time| WARNING: BCP 177 violation. Detected non-functional IPv6 loopback. comm_epoll_incomingcomm_incoming() stats public -Mensagem original- De:

Re: [squid-users] [ext] Re: Absolute upper limit for filedescriptors in squid-6?

On 26/01/22 12:14, André Bolinhas wrote: Hi I have a question regarding with this topic to, I need about 2M filedescriptors so my squid is compiled with --enable-poll and --enable-epoll. In this case which mechanism Squid will use poll or epoll? Should be epoll. You can verify with the

Re: [squid-users] [ext] Re: Absolute upper limit for filedescriptors in squid-6?

Hi I have a question regarding with this topic to, I need about 2M filedescriptors so my squid is compiled with --enable-poll and --enable-epoll. In this case which mechanism Squid will use poll or epoll? Also, for better performance for large FD, which mechanism did you recommend poll, epoll or

Re: [squid-users] [ext] Re: Absolute upper limit for filedescriptors in squid-6?

On 26/01/22 03:55, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Francesco Chemolli: See configure --max-filedescriptors ... configure: forcing default of 131072 filedescriptors (user-forced) checking Default FD_SETSIZE value... 1024 checking for getrlimit... yes checking for setrlimit... yes checking Maximum

[squid-users] The status of AIA ie: TLS code: X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT_LOCALLY ?

Hey, I have recently seen more then one site that doesn't provide the full CA bundle chain. An example: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=www.cloudschool.org https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d= certificatechain.io I wanted to somehow get this issue logged properly.

Re: [squid-users] Tune Squid proxy to handle 90k connection

Any tip about my last comment? -Mensagem original- De: André Bolinhas Enviada: 21 de janeiro de 2022 16:36 Para: 'Amos Jeffries' ; squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org Assunto: RE: [squid-users] Tune Squid proxy to handle 90k connection Thanks Amos Yes, you are right, I will put a second

Re: [squid-users] [ext] Re: Absolute upper limit for filedescriptors in squid-6?

* Francesco Chemolli : > See configure --max-filedescriptors ... configure: forcing default of 131072 filedescriptors (user-forced) checking Default FD_SETSIZE value... 1024 checking for getrlimit... yes checking for setrlimit... yes checking Maximum number of filedescriptors we can open... 32768

Re: [squid-users] Absolute upper limit for filedescriptors in squid-6?

See configure --max-filedescriptors It really depends on the OS. See SQUID_CHECK_MAXFD in https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/blob/master/acinclude/os-deps.m4#L166 You can see it printed at configure time for your specific OS On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:31 PM Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > What

Re: [squid-users] Reverse DNS lookups from squid logging port

On 1/25/22 4:25 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 25/01/22 17:38, Alex Rousskov wrote: >> On 1/24/22 7:24 PM, Praveen Ponakanti wrote: >>> The proposed solution seems to be to change the following lines and >>> recompile. If this is still the recommended fix, can it be upstreamed in >>> an upcoming

[squid-users] Absolute upper limit for filedescriptors in squid-6?

What is the absolute upper limit for filedescriptor in squid-6? Am I limited to 64k dues to use of select(), or are larger numbers possible? -- Ralf Hildebrandt Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF) Haus I | 1. OG | Raum 105

Re: [squid-users] Reverse DNS lookups from squid logging port

On 25/01/22 17:38, Alex Rousskov wrote: On 1/24/22 7:24 PM, Praveen Ponakanti wrote: The proposed solution seems to be to change the following lines and recompile. If this is still the recommended fix, can it be upstreamed in an upcoming release?