Re: [squid-users] Fwd: cache_peer_access by dynamic ACL

2023-04-26 Thread Alexeyяр Gruzdov
Thank you very much for you answer and explanation Yep, I don’t use name “proxy” for annotations, it was just for example only . Bets regards! Alexg On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 18:34, Alex Rousskov < rouss...@measurement-factory.com> wrote: > On 4/26/23 08:08, Alexeyяр Gruzdov wrote: > > Oh...

Re: [squid-users] Fwd: cache_peer_access by dynamic ACL

2023-04-26 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 4/26/23 08:08, Alexeyяр Gruzdov wrote: Oh... Looks like I just need to send as answer the list of my policy acl, for example user1 wanted to go over peer1 and peer3 the answer from external script must be like  "OK proxy=peer1 proxy=peer3"  and looks like it works well like I need. User

Re: [squid-users] Fwd: cache_peer_access by dynamic ACL

2023-04-26 Thread Alexeyяр Gruzdov
Oh... Looks like I just need to send as answer the list of my policy acl, for example user1 wanted to go over peer1 and peer3 the answer from external script must be like "OK proxy=peer1 proxy=peer3" and looks like it works well like I need. User will go over peer1 and peer3 only by round-robin.

Re: [squid-users] Fwd: cache_peer_access by dynamic ACL

2023-04-26 Thread Alexeyяр Gruzdov
Hello! Yes! Thank you! One more question pls: For example I have five of cache_peers and ACL associated with some cache peer. As you know - I used the my external ACL script and now I can put the policy to answer fo my script and squid will get an answer and used the correct ACL for username.

Re: [squid-users] Caching uncachable resources

2023-04-26 Thread Andrey K
Hello, Amos, Thank you for the information. The headers I included in the previous message were taken from the "outside" proxy interface, i.e. were sent by the original content server (I think it is a CDN): > > Content-Type: video/MP2T > *Expires: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:01 GMT* >