Re: [squid-users] Log proxy hostname along with HTTP access URI

2015-02-24 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 2015-02-25 03:44, Peter Oruba wrote: Am 24.02.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Ron Wheeler : On 24/02/2015 9:04 AM, Peter Oruba wrote: Hello everybody, I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from Squid’s perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an option for differ

Re: [squid-users] Log proxy hostname along with HTTP access URI

2015-02-24 Thread Peter Oruba
> Am 24.02.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Ron Wheeler : > > On 24/02/2015 9:04 AM, Peter Oruba wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from Squid’s >> perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an option for >> different reasons and the

Re: [squid-users] Log proxy hostname along with HTTP access URI

2015-02-24 Thread Peter Oruba
Thanks, Brendan, but unfortunately I don’t have access to the NAT configuration. > Am 24.02.2015 um 15:37 schrieb Brendan Kearney : > > On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Oruba wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> >> I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from >> Squid’s

Re: [squid-users] Log proxy hostname along with HTTP access URI

2015-02-24 Thread Brendan Kearney
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Oruba wrote: > Hello everybody, > > > I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from > Squid’s perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an > option for different reasons and the idea that came up was to assign > each client

[squid-users] Log proxy hostname along with HTTP access URI

2015-02-24 Thread Peter Oruba
Hello everybody, I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from Squid’s perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an option for different reasons and the idea that came up was to assign each client a unique hostname through which Squid would be addressed (e.g. UUI