On 2015-02-25 03:44, Peter Oruba wrote:
Am 24.02.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Ron Wheeler :
On 24/02/2015 9:04 AM, Peter Oruba wrote:
Hello everybody,
I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from
Squid’s perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an
option for differ
> Am 24.02.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Ron Wheeler :
>
> On 24/02/2015 9:04 AM, Peter Oruba wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from Squid’s
>> perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an option for
>> different reasons and the
Thanks, Brendan, but unfortunately I don’t have access to the NAT configuration.
> Am 24.02.2015 um 15:37 schrieb Brendan Kearney :
>
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Oruba wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>>
>> I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from
>> Squid’s
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Oruba wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>
> I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from
> Squid’s perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an
> option for different reasons and the idea that came up was to assign
> each client
Hello everybody,
I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from Squid’s
perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an option for different
reasons and the idea that came up was to assign each client a unique hostname
through which Squid would be addressed (e.g. UUI