Re: [squid-users] New Squid prefers IPv4

2024-02-06 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there On 06/02/2024 16:24, Antony Stone wrote: On Tuesday 06 February 2024 at 16:16:24, Rob van der Putten wrote: On 05/02/2024 18:32, Antony Stone wrote: I believe ping (ICMP) timings are irrelevant. The client (squid in this case) does a DNS lookup for the hostname's A and

Re: [squid-users] New Squid prefers IPv4

2024-02-06 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 2024-02-06 10:16, Rob van der Putten wrote: On 05/02/2024 18:32, Antony Stone wrote: On Monday 05 February 2024 at 17:32:51, Rob van der Putten wrote: On 05/02/2024 17:16, Dieter Bloms wrote: On Mon, Feb 05, Rob van der Putten wrote: After upgrading Squid from 3 to 5 the percentage of

Re: [squid-users] New Squid prefers IPv4

2024-02-06 Thread Antony Stone
On Tuesday 06 February 2024 at 16:16:24, Rob van der Putten wrote: > Hi there > > On 05/02/2024 18:32, Antony Stone wrote: > > > > I believe ping (ICMP) timings are irrelevant. The client (squid in this > > case) does a DNS lookup for the hostname's A and records, > > A before . Bind

Re: [squid-users] New Squid prefers IPv4

2024-02-06 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there On 05/02/2024 18:32, Antony Stone wrote: On Monday 05 February 2024 at 17:32:51, Rob van der Putten wrote: On 05/02/2024 17:16, Dieter Bloms wrote: On Mon, Feb 05, Rob van der Putten wrote: After upgrading Squid from 3 to 5 the percentage of IPv6 reduced from 61% to less then

Re: [squid-users] New Squid prefers IPv4

2024-02-05 Thread speedy67
Spam detection software, running on the system "master.squid-cache.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for

Re: [squid-users] New Squid prefers IPv4

2024-02-05 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 2024-02-05 11:32, Rob van der Putten wrote: On 05/02/2024 17:16, Dieter Bloms wrote: On Mon, Feb 05, Rob van der Putten wrote: After upgrading Squid from 3 to 5 the percentage of IPv6 reduced from 61% to less then 1%. Any ideas? yes, since squid5 the happy eyeball algorithm as described

Re: [squid-users] New Squid prefers IPv4

2024-02-05 Thread Antony Stone
On Monday 05 February 2024 at 17:32:51, Rob van der Putten wrote: > Hi there > > On 05/02/2024 17:16, Dieter Bloms wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, Rob van der Putten wrote: > >> After upgrading Squid from 3 to 5 the percentage of IPv6 reduced from > >> 61% to less then 1%. > >> Any ideas? > > > >

Re: [squid-users] New Squid prefers IPv4

2024-02-05 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there On 05/02/2024 17:16, Dieter Bloms wrote: On Mon, Feb 05, Rob van der Putten wrote: After upgrading Squid from 3 to 5 the percentage of IPv6 reduced from 61% to less then 1%. Any ideas? yes, since squid5 the happy eyeball algorithm as described in rfc 8305 is used. If your ipv4

Re: [squid-users] New Squid prefers IPv4

2024-02-05 Thread Dieter Bloms
Hello Rob, On Mon, Feb 05, Rob van der Putten wrote: > After upgrading Squid from 3 to 5 the percentage of IPv6 reduced from 61% to > less then 1%. > Any ideas? yes, since squid5 the happy eyeball algorithm as described in rfc 8305 is used. If your ipv4 connectivity is better than ipv6 than

[squid-users] New Squid prefers IPv4

2024-02-05 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there After upgrading Squid from 3 to 5 the percentage of IPv6 reduced from 61% to less then 1%. Any ideas? Regards, Rob ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org https://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users