On 14/12/2016 2:56 p.m., cred...@eml.cc wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016, at 06:33 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 14/12/2016 2:10 p.m., creditu wrote:
>>> Looking for the best way to provide cache peer access for two urls on a
>>> 3.1 accelerator. For example if a set of backend servers fullfill
>>>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016, at 06:33 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 14/12/2016 2:10 p.m., creditu wrote:
> > Looking for the best way to provide cache peer access for two urls on a
> > 3.1 accelerator. For example if a set of backend servers fullfill
> > requests for both www.example.com and www-legacy.e
On 14/12/2016 2:10 p.m., creditu wrote:
> Looking for the best way to provide cache peer access for two urls on a
> 3.1 accelerator. For example if a set of backend servers fullfill
> requests for both www.example.com and www-legacy.example.com is the
> following the correct way to handle them in
Looking for the best way to provide cache peer access for two urls on a
3.1 accelerator. For example if a set of backend servers fullfill
requests for both www.example.com and www-legacy.example.com is the
following the correct way to handle them in regards to the cach peer
access?
http_port 19
