On Sunday 23 October 2016 at 14:42:02, Krishna Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi Antony,
> Thanks for the reply. I have made changes in squid.conf as per your
> suggestion and have allocated 20 GB of Hard disk space.
Have you made any measurements at all (either before making the disk cache
bigger, or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
In the final, I do not think Squid architecture is designed for fast
access to huge amounts of memory. It came from a time when computers
were young, memory cost like Boeing and hardly Squid itself seriously
reworked in this part since then.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
23.10.2016 18:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas пишет:
>> 23.10.2016 17:40, Yuri Voinov пишет:
>>> This effect is good known to all who have worked with relational
>>> databases. In fact, it is typical in general for all caches except
>>> purpose-built
23.10.2016 17:40, Yuri Voinov пишет:
This effect is good known to all who have worked with relational
databases. In fact, it is typical in general for all caches except
purpose-built highly scalable systems.
23.10.2016 17:37, Matus UHLAR - fantomas пишет:
> doesn't that imply kind of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
In fact, the explanation is very simple. At some point soon will get the
content from the disc using an index of any kind than consequentially
and fully scan the giant structure in RAM.
Performance indicator is expressed in the data access time.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This effect is good known to all who have worked with relational
databases. In fact, it is typical in general for all caches except
purpose-built highly scalable systems.
23.10.2016 17:37, Matus UHLAR - fantomas пишет:
> doesn't that imply kind
On 23.10.16 17:15, Yuri Voinov wrote:
Keep in mind - a huge in-memory cache does not always give the
acceleration. Moreover, in most cases you can get the opposite effect
expected. It is a common misconception - that the giant memory cache
will give a giant performance gain.
doesn't that imply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Keep in mind - a huge in-memory cache does not always give the
acceleration. Moreover, in most cases you can get the opposite effect
expected. It is a common misconception - that the giant memory cache
will give a giant performance gain.
On Sunday 23 October 2016 at 05:36:22, Krishna Kulkarni wrote:
> I am new to squid.. I have installed squid 3.5 on CentOS 6.7. As a
> configuration part, I have kept most of the things default. Please advice
> on how to allocate cache memory of 20 GB to squid.
Do you mean cache memory, or disk
