Le 14/03/2018 à 15:02, Yuri a écrit :
> I can confirm - ufdbguard is up-to-date and very good customizable
> replacement for SquidGuard. Using ufdbguard last three years gives
> perfect results and bring functionality which is absent in
> SquidGuard.
>
> ufdbguard has good support of https (incl
On 15/03/18 02:55, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 14/03/2018 à 14:46, Marcus Kool a écrit :
>> ufdbGuard is the tool that you need.
>> It is an old fork of ufdbGuard with many new features, very good
>> performance and it has regular maintenance.
>> If you have a question, you can ask the support desk
On 15/03/18 02:13, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 14/03/2018 à 14:06, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
>> Then the first thing you and your readers need to be clear on is that
>> SquidGuard was end-of-life'd many years ago. It is long overdue for
>> removal or replacement. This has impact such as the one you sa
14.03.2018 19:55, Nicolas Kovacs пишет:
> Le 14/03/2018 à 14:46, Marcus Kool a écrit :
>> ufdbGuard is the tool that you need.
>> It is an old fork of ufdbGuard with many new features, very good
>> performance and it has regular maintenance.
>> If you have a question, you can ask the support desk
On 14/03/18 10:55, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 14/03/2018 à 14:46, Marcus Kool a écrit :
ufdbGuard is the tool that you need.
It is an old fork of ufdbGuard with many new features, very good
performance and it has regular maintenance.
If you have a question, you can ask the support desk at
www.url
14.03.2018 19:06, Amos Jeffries пишет:
> On 15/03/18 01:43, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>> Le 14/03/2018 à 13:39, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
>>> Yes, I do. Because this is part of a step-by-step course about
>>> SquidGuard, which worked perfectly under Slackware Linux. And my
>>> filtering rules are becom
Le 14/03/2018 à 14:46, Marcus Kool a écrit :
> ufdbGuard is the tool that you need.
> It is an old fork of ufdbGuard with many new features, very good
> performance and it has regular maintenance.
> If you have a question, you can ask the support desk at
> www.urlfilterdb.com.
> You will get an ans
ufdbGuard is the tool that you need.
It is an old fork of ufdbGuard with many new features, very good performance
and it has regular maintenance.
If you have a question, you can ask the support desk at www.urlfilterdb.com.
You will get an answer from me or a colleague.
Marcus
On 14/03/18 09:39
On 15/03/18 01:43, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 14/03/2018 à 13:39, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
>> Yes, I do. Because this is part of a step-by-step course about
>> SquidGuard, which worked perfectly under Slackware Linux. And my
>> filtering rules are becoming increasingly complex.
> FYI, this is the c
Le 14/03/2018 à 14:06, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
> Then the first thing you and your readers need to be clear on is that
> SquidGuard was end-of-life'd many years ago. It is long overdue for
> removal or replacement. This has impact such as the one you saw on HTTPS
> traffic support which was only ad
On 15/03/18 01:43, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 14/03/2018 à 13:39, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
>> Yes, I do. Because this is part of a step-by-step course about
>> SquidGuard, which worked perfectly under Slackware Linux. And my
>> filtering rules are becoming increasingly complex.
>
> FYI, this is th
Le 14/03/2018 à 13:39, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
> Yes, I do. Because this is part of a step-by-step course about
> SquidGuard, which worked perfectly under Slackware Linux. And my
> filtering rules are becoming increasingly complex.
FYI, this is the course. It's a HOWTO in simple text format.
I'm
Le 14/03/2018 à 13:33, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
> You do not need SG or any fancy redirector helpers at all for that.
Yes, I do. Because this is part of a step-by-step course about
SquidGuard, which worked perfectly under Slackware Linux. And my
filtering rules are becoming increasingly complex.
N
On 15/03/18 01:07, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working with Squid + SquidGuard for a few years, though only
> on Slackware. I'm currently transferring my proxy expertise to CentOS 7,
> and right now I'm having a little problem with that.
>
> Squid works perfectly so far as a transpa
Hi,
I've been working with Squid + SquidGuard for a few years, though only
on Slackware. I'm currently transferring my proxy expertise to CentOS 7,
and right now I'm having a little problem with that.
Squid works perfectly so far as a transparent HTTP + HTTPS cache proxy.
The next step is to add
15 matches
Mail list logo
