-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Transparent and non Transparent at the same time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Good. We are came to an agreement :)
Peace :)
Let's support to op :)
28.10.2016 1:14, Antony Stone пишет:
> On Thursday 27 October 2016 at 21:09:44, Y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Good. We are came to an agreement :)
Peace :)
Let's support to op :)
28.10.2016 1:14, Antony Stone пишет:
> On Thursday 27 October 2016 at 21:09:44, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>
>> OP originally wrote - "I have no IPtables and so on."
>> He needs
On Thursday 27 October 2016 at 21:09:44, Yuri Voinov wrote:
> OP originally wrote - "I have no IPtables and so on."
> He needs specific guidance, not word games.
Agreed.
Antony.
--
There's no such thing as bad weather - only the wrong clothes.
- Billy Connolly
On Thursday 27 October 2016 at 21:04:18, Yuri Voinov wrote:
> (facepalm)
>
> rdr(REDIRECT) is NAT functionality? Yes or no?
Apologies - I could have answered this better:
Yes, REDIRECT is one NAT functionality. There are several others.
On Thursday 27 October 2016 at 19:46:53, Eliezer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Well,
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/LinuxRedirect
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/LinuxDnat
If I'm not stupid completely, this examples both uses NAT functionality.
Yes or no?
The question - what do
On Thursday 27 October 2016 at 21:04:18, Yuri Voinov wrote:
> (facepalm)
>
> rdr(REDIRECT) is NAT functionality? Yes or no?
Yes, DNAT is one NAT functionality. There are several others.
On Thursday 27 October 2016 at 19:46:53, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> You need routing policy not DNAT.
DNAT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
(facepalm)
rdr(REDIRECT) is NAT functionality? Yes or no?
28.10.2016 0:59, Antony Stone пишет:
> On Thursday 27 October 2016 at 20:57:04, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>
>> You know method to do this without NAT? ;)
>
> I know how to do it without DNAT,
On Thursday 27 October 2016 at 20:57:04, Yuri Voinov wrote:
> You know method to do this without NAT? ;)
I know how to do it without DNAT, which is what Eliezer recommended and you
challenged.
Antony.
--
"The tofu battle I saw last weekend was quite brutal."
- Marija Danute Brigita
ministrator
>>> Mobile: +972-5-28704261
>>> Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org]
>>
>> On Behalf Of erdosain9
>>
>>>
lists.squid-cache.org]
>
> On Behalf Of erdosain9
>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 19:08
> > To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Transparent and non Transparent at the same
>
> time
>
> > Ok... but i have this problem
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
erdosain9,
here is documentation your required.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept
Sadly, but interception proxy with modern Squid, in addition to router
with PBR/WCCP redirection, also always required NAT, configured on proxy
rg]
On Behalf Of Yuri Voinov
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 20:51
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Transparent and non Transparent at the same
time
>
>
> You absolutely sure, Eliezier? :)
>
>
> 27.10.2016 23:46, Eli
and non Transparent at the same time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
You absolutely sure, Eliezier? :)
27.10.2016 23:46, Eliezer Croitoru пишет:
> You need routing policy not DNAT.
>
> Eliezer
>
>
> Eliezer Croitoru
> Linux System Administrator
>
Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org]
On Behalf Of erdosain9
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 19:08
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Transparent and non T
, 2016 19:08
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Transparent and non Transparent at the same time
Ok... but i have this problem
ERROR: NAT/TPROXY lookup failed to locate original IPs on
local=192.168.1.15:3130 remote=192.168.1.1:52090 FD 14 flags=33
...
I put some dstnat
Ok... but i have this problem
ERROR: NAT/TPROXY lookup failed to locate original IPs on
local=192.168.1.15:3130 remote=192.168.1.1:52090 FD 14 flags=33
...
I put some dstnat in Mikrotik (192.168.1.1)
ip firewall nat add chain=dstnat src-add=192.168.1.121 protocol=tcp
dst-port=80
Hi.
Well, i just want to know if is possible config at the same time Transparent
and No Transparent for different subnets...
Like
192.168.1.0/24 No transparent
192.168.100.0/24-- Transparent
i want this, because i have a net (1.0) that i can manager and other
17 matches
Mail list logo
