Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-04-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 3/04/2016 10:09 a.m., joe wrote: > again if i only me on server just sending this file multiple of time i keep > getting in acsess.log > 2016/04/03 01:08:09.245 kid1| varyEvaluateMatch: Oops. Not a Vary match on > second attempt, 'http://12kms.tayyar.org/Services.asmx/JsonFile' > 'accept-encodi

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-04-02 Thread joe
again if i only me on server just sending this file multiple of time i keep getting in acsess.log 2016/04/03 01:08:09.245 kid1| varyEvaluateMatch: Oops. Not a Vary match on second attempt, 'http://12kms.tayyar.org/Services.asmx/JsonFile' 'accept-encoding="gzip,%20deflate"' 2016/04/03 01:08:09.245

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-10 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 10/03/2016 10:57 p.m., joe wrote: > >> Ah, you said you understood Vary. But this mail indicates that you do >> not quite understand it well enough. > i do understand may be the way sometime i try to explain it goes buggy lol > like those bug any way > >> I prune away the extra headers to clar

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-10 Thread joe
>Ah, you said you understood Vary. But this mail indicates that you do >not quite understand it well enough. i do understand may be the way sometime i try to explain it goes buggy lol like those bug any way >I prune away the extra headers to clarify: >>Firefox: >> GET /en_US/embeds.js HTTP/1.1

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 10/03/2016 7:40 a.m., joe wrote: > look at that firefox and chrome same vary > z > http://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js > Ah, you said you understood Vary. But this mail indicates that you do not quite understand it well enough. I prune away the extra headers to clarify: Firefox

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread joe
may be but i dont see in header CF-Cache-Status: HIT blue coat header mmm i i tryed xnxx.com and it dose have that header lol so bluecoat even if the bypass some mobile link still change its header wonder :( -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.10190

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Man, from that we had to start. It will almost certainly strip User-Agent from Vary to increase its own cache hits. 10.03.16 1:22, joe пишет: > bluecoat where is my bandwidth > coming from -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEc

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread joe
i bypass my self no cache server to see what happening the only cache i think if its affecting me bluecoat where is my bandwidth coming from chrome == GET /en_US/embeds.js HTTP/1.1 Host: platform.instagram.com Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/webp,*/*

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 But I suggests we are not about client User-Agent. We are about _server_ reply Vary, which does not contain User-Agent for unknown reason. 10.03.16 0:57, joe пишет: > duno probably i use pc windows xp ?? > try on ur pcuse diferent browser a

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 http://i.imgur.com/aQDFt6U.png http://i.imgur.com/655E8KM.png As you can see, Chrome and Edge gives different User-Agent. 10.03.16 0:57, joe пишет: > duno probably i use pc windows xp ?? > try on ur pcuse diferent browser and see the header

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread joe
duno probably i use pc windows xp ?? try on ur pcuse diferent browser and see the header and let me know pls -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/clientProcessHit-tp4676484p4676567.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabb

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 You Vary header does not contain User-Agent. Why? 10.03.16 0:40, joe пишет: > Vary: Accept-Encoding -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW4HWdAAoJENNXIZxhPexGStwH/2AbBxtR/vJ/7XRmsAeb2zW9 izEnnYvXk5jFte9SUY9H/pDe5pWV0D

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread joe
look at that firefox and chrome same vary http://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js GET /en_US/embeds.js HTTP/1.1 Host: platform.instagram.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread joe
ok then instagram app betwean android and iphone or soo they have diferent useragent they chare same link example http://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js so some phone get cached object and the other none not right!! and its same link :( -- View this message in context: http://squ

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 10.03.16 0:25, joe пишет: > tks Yuri Voinov > lol i do understand how Vary work but what im trying to understand is > 1 = firefox has matching vary as chrome Chrome and Firefox can't give the same Vary. User-Agent is different. > > 2 = when i us

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread joe
tks Yuri Voinov lol i do understand how Vary work but what im trying to understand is 1 = firefox has matching vary as chrome 2 = when i use same link on chrome has varyEvaluateMatch: Oops. Not a Vary match & clientProcessHit: Vary object loop! and on firefox non since that link for the instagra

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 http://mark.koli.ch/understanding-the-http-vary-header-and-caching-proxies-squid-etc 09.03.16 23:48, joe пишет: > you ar talking about Vary: Accept-Encoding > on both Firefox and chrome right ?? > > > Amos Jeffries wrote >> On 10/03/2016 2:50 a.

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://varvy.com/mobile/vary-user-agent.html 09.03.16 23:48, joe пишет: > you ar talking about Vary: Accept-Encoding > on both Firefox and chrome right ?? > > > Amos Jeffries wrote >> On 10/03/2016 2:50 a.m., joe wrote: >>> what im trying to ex

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread joe
you ar talking about Vary: Accept-Encoding on both Firefox and chrome right ?? Amos Jeffries wrote > On 10/03/2016 2:50 a.m., joe wrote: >> what im trying to explain is varyEvaluateMatch 90% chrome or download >> manager >> firefox and ie.. no issue even on mobile firefox is no problem c

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 10/03/2016 2:50 a.m., joe wrote: > what im trying to explain is varyEvaluateMatch 90% chrome or download > manager > firefox and ie.. no issue even on mobile firefox is no problem chrome > has > The "problem" is that when Squid looks up a URL whih has variant(s) in the cache it looks up

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread joe
what im trying to explain is varyEvaluateMatch 90% chrome or download manager firefox and ie.. no issue even on mobile firefox is no problem chrome has -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/clientProcessHit-tp4676484p4676550.html Sent from th

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread joe
test on chrom -- 2016/03/09 15:31:14.124 kid1| 45,9| cbdata.cc(299) cbdataInternalAlloc: Allocating 0x9d86ffb8 2016/03/09 15:31:14.124 kid1| 79,3| DiskIO/DiskThreads/DiskThreadsDiskFile.cc(33) DiskThreadsDiskFile: UFSFile::UFSFile: /mnt/cache-a/0F/F5/004FF5D4 2016/03/09 15:3

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-09 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 9/03/2016 1:02 p.m., joe wrote: > testing http://cdn1.traffichaus.com/scripts/mfloat.js > on diferent browser > - > firefox > 2016/03/09 01:57:15 kid1| varyEvaluateMatch: Oops. Not a Vary match on > second attempt, 'http://cdn1.traffichaus.com/scripts/mfloat.js' > 'accept

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-08 Thread joe
this link dose o posit http://weatherblink.wdgserv.com/weatherblink/lookup/Beirut,%20Lebanon on chrom no error on firefox error 2016/03/09 02:58:52 kid1| varyEvaluateMatch: Oops. Not a Vary match on second attempt, 'http://weatherblink.wdgserv.com/weatherblink/lookup/Beirut,%20Lebanon' 'accept-en

Re: [squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-08 Thread joe
testing http://cdn1.traffichaus.com/scripts/mfloat.js on diferent browser - firefox 2016/03/09 01:57:15 kid1| varyEvaluateMatch: Oops. Not a Vary match on second attempt, 'http://cdn1.traffichaus.com/scripts/mfloat.js' 'accept-encoding="gzip,%20deflate,%20sdch"' 2016/03/09 0

[squid-users] clientProcessHit

2016-03-07 Thread joe
after the patch 4447 until now i had over then normal 016/03/07 09:07:52 kid1| varyEvaluateMatch: Oops. Not a Vary match on second attempt, 'http://www.bbc.com/capital/static/7b8a43699a3b/scripts/vendor/comscore/comscore.js' 'accept-encoding="gzip,%20deflate,%20sdch"' 2016/03/07 09:07:52 kid1|