On 28/06/18 11:04, Gordon Hsiao wrote:
>
> Keep reading http_port vs https_port here...
>
> 1. http_port does not require openssl, https_port does, however
> http_port can do ssl-bump so I would think http_port is conditionally
> depending on openssl
Yes.
> 2. reading cfgman v3.5 page I could
>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:55:29 -0500
> From: Gordon Hsiao
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: [squid-users] http_port vs https_port
> Message-ID:
> <
> cak0ifyxx6_jyme1hdsdsvoof5_pbmevoatavnbzh56uljni...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content
On 06/27/2018 10:55 AM, Gordon Hsiao wrote:
> Reading all the cfg options in Squid 3.5 I noticed http_port has lots of
> SSL related options(which it should not), plus https_port is referring
> to http_port for those options, should http_port have nothing to do with
> ssl-specific options and those
Reading all the cfg options in Squid 3.5 I noticed http_port has lots of
SSL related options(which it should not), plus https_port is referring to
http_port for those options, should http_port have nothing to do with
ssl-specific options and those ssl-options could be better moved to
https_port sec
