-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/11/2014 1:26 p.m., Ahmed Allzaeem wrote:
> Hi Amos , thanks for reply.
>
> But I think using large rock will let the memory cache size be >32
> ??? am I correct ?
>
Maybe no, maybe yes. Shared memory is a separate feature to large
rock. They
Allzaeem
Cc: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid cache Large rock with aufs optimization for
bandwidth saving
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/11/2014 2:24 a.m., Ahmed Allzaeem wrote:
> Hi Amos , thank you
>
> Really sorry to ask you , wts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/11/2014 2:24 a.m., Ahmed Allzaeem wrote:
> Hi Amos , thank you
>
> Really sorry to ask you , wts needed to be done to use largerock
> support ?
Example 5GB rock cache;
cache_dir rock /ssd1 5000
>
> I mean wt wring im doing ?
>
> Also abou
, November 15, 2014 4:11 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid cache Large rock with aufs optimization for
bandwidth saving
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/11/2014 8:07 p.m., Ahmed Allzaeem wrote:
> Hi developers .
>
The developers are no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/11/2014 8:07 p.m., Ahmed Allzaeem wrote:
> Hi developers .
>
The developers are not here. This is the user mailing list.
...
> But still wondering , why after im using squid3.head that support
> large rock and using aufs with 4 processes with
Hi developers .
Im using squid
Squid Cache: Version 3.HEAD-20141105-r13687
With options :
Service Name: squid
configure options: '--prefix=/usr' '--includedir=/include'
'--mandir=/share/man' '--infodir=/share/info' '--sysconfdir=/etc'
'--enable-cachemgr-hostname=drx' '--localstatedir
