Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

On 08/21/2015 01:28 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Christos has managed (we think) to resolve a fairly major design issue > that has been plaguing the 3.5 series peek-and-splice feature so far. > () Clarification: No major design issue has been

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

On 21/08/2015 11:04 p.m., Marcus Kool wrote: > I do not want to spoil things, but did you already read my latest > addition to bug 4303 ? > > Marcus > Haven't had a chance to read the logs yet, but got the main text. Thank you. The main emphasis of the patch was getting the action ignore/skip a

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 05:26 -0600, James Lay wrote: > On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 19:28 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Christos has managed (we think) to resolve a fairly major design issue > > that has been plaguing the 3.5 series peek-and-splice feature so far. > > (

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 19:28 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Hi all, > > Christos has managed (we think) to resolve a fairly major design issue > that has been plaguing the 3.5 series peek-and-splice feature so far. > () > > The problem was t

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

I do not want to spoil things, but did you already read my latest addition to bug 4303 ? Marcus On 08/21/2015 04:28 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Hi all, Christos has managed (we think) to resolve a fairly major design issue that has been plaguing the 3.5 series peek-and-splice feature so far.

[squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

Hi all, Christos has managed (we think) to resolve a fairly major design issue that has been plaguing the 3.5 series peek-and-splice feature so far. () The problem was that Squid was not actually following the intended and documented logic