Re: [squid-users] Squid in DMZ Help

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, cdwz wrote: > The default Gateway on ISA's DMZ interface should be Squid, > right? The default gateway on the ISA's DMZ interface should be the router in that part of your network if any. If the DMZ is between two firewalls then the firewalls are the routers. > Also, I wa

RE: [squid-users] Band New Squid Log Analyzer! [not working?]

Hi, I have fixed this problem. It happened because some AWK doesn't support 'systime' and some other functions. New version is now available at http://www.risk.az/scalar/scalar094/scalar.awk In order to avoid this problem you have to Change maintenance options (inside script header) by

[squid-users] Log Analyzer (SCALAR) New Release...

Hi everybody, New version of SCALAR is available now. You can download it from http://scalar.risk.az/scalar094/scalar.awk PLEASE NOTE. SCALAR IS SUPPORTING SQUID NATIVE LOG FORMAT ONLY New Version (0.94) has some bugfixes and 1 new report related to cache Hierarchy Analysis (Hierarch

[squid-users] Squid Error

I am using ncsa authentication. When I use authentication. I get following in cache.log 2003/09/14 19:30:29| aclAuthenticated: authentication not applicable on accelerated requests. 2003/09/14 19:30:31| aclAuthenticated: authentication not applicable on accelerated requests. 2003/09/14 19:30

RE: [squid-users] Log Analyzer (SCALAR) New Release...

Mika, Thank you for your valuable notice. The problem is because of magic 1024 number :) Problem will be fixed in next release, stay tuned... Regards, Yuri -Original Message- From: Mika A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 18:35 To: Yuri N. Fominov Sub

[squid-users] access.log analysis queries

Hi all, We're beginning to look at the logfile analysis section of an ongoing Squid based project. Nothing in existence really offers what we need as it's not really tailored towards our market or our users, plus our logs contain an identd lookup string which is customised to our requirements

Re: [squid-users] access.log analysis queries

I have given thought to it and would be starting this soon. I have decided to use php to analysis access.log file. By using php, you extract access.log file line by line. store "Timestamp", "bytes", "IP address", etc in mysql database row. Each line of access.log file will be converted to each row

Re: [squid-users] Squid Error

> When I use authentication. I get following in > cache.log > 2003/09/14 19:30:29| aclAuthenticated: authentication > not applicable on accelerated requests. Check out what I found using Goolgle and the list archives: http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200304/0003.html I believ

Re: [squid-users] Squid Error

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, ads squid wrote: > I am using ncsa authentication. > When I use authentication. I get following in > cache.log > > > 2003/09/14 19:30:29| aclAuthenticated: authentication > not applicable on accelerated requests. Are you attempting to use authentication in a transparen

[squid-users] authentication errors

I am using squid v. 2.5.STABLE3 with FreeBSD v 5.1 Attempting to use basic authentication with the lines: auth_param basic program /usr/local/libexec/ncsa_auth /files/conf/proxy_access auth_param basic children 5 auth_param basic realm auth.myserver.com auth_param basic credentialsttl 2 hours My

Re: [squid-users] authentication errors

On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 09:16, Brad Holman wrote: > I am using squid v. 2.5.STABLE3 with FreeBSD v 5.1 > > Attempting to use basic authentication with the lines: > > auth_param basic program /usr/local/libexec/ncsa_auth > /files/conf/proxy_access > auth_param basic children 5 > auth_param basic rea

RE: [squid-users] authentication errors

I already tried that. Still has the same effect. Brad -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 6:24 PM To: Brad Holman Cc: Squid Users Subject: Re: [squid-users] authentication errors On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 09:16, Brad Holman wro

Re: [squid-users] authentication errors

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Brad Holman wrote: > I am using squid v. 2.5.STABLE3 with FreeBSD v 5.1 > > Attempting to use basic authentication with the lines: > > auth_param basic program /usr/local/libexec/ncsa_auth > /files/conf/proxy_access > auth_param basic children 5 > auth_param basic realm auth

RE: [squid-users] authentication errors

I tried it above the ACL & below. I had the same result. Brad -Original Message- From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 6:36 PM To: Brad Holman Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [squid-users] authentication errors On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Brad Ho

Re: [squid-users] authentication errors

> Attempting to use basic authentication with the lines: > When squid loads, I get the error: > 2003/09/14 17:39:37| aclParseAclLine: IGNORING: Proxy Auth ACL 'acl > password proxy_auth REQUIRED ' because no authentication schemes are fully > configured. Did you compile in support for basic auth

[squid-users] unable to use squid over vpn

Hi I am trying to make squid over a VPN connection, but no matter what I try, I can't get it to work. I have squid-2.5-stable-2 installed on a RedHat 9.0 machine and from within the office it works fine. However, when I make a VPN connection to the Windows domain from outside, I can't get squid t

[squid-users] IE5/Win2k/WPAD not working[Scanned]

Hello all!! I've followed every article and howto on the subject and still can't get it to work!! Basically: from the Win2k box's IE5 I can open "http://wpad/wpad.dat"; perfectly. Even "http://wpad.mydomain.com/wpad.dat";, etc. These in reality point to an apache server. The appropriate (applica

Re: [squid-users] help with 3.0 PRE2[Scanned]

On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 22:04, J.D. Bronson wrote: > At 06:59 AM 07/30/2003, you wrote: > >* J.D. Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Where do I ask for help on a build (under solaris 9 sparc) for Squid 3.0? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > PS. I am not sure its a bug...but even a vanilla build fails.

Re: [squid-users] Speed : SQUID vs MS proxy

On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 14:16, aqil wrote: > Here are the specs of the hardwares : > SQUID: What version of squid? What cache_dir line are you using? Rob -- GPG key available at: . signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message pa

Re: [squid-users] Speed : SQUID vs MS proxy

On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 15:14, aqil wrote: > Pada 08-Sep-2003, Robert Collins menulis: > > On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 14:16, aqil wrote: > > > Here are the specs of the hardwares : > > > SQUID: > > > > What version of squid? > > What cache_dir line are you using? > > squid-2.5.STABLE3 I think... > cach

Re: [squid-users] Squid authentication from ADS to linux proxyserver(squid)

You can use LDAP authentication. Try squid's LDAP authenticator program (included with the code), and there's a bunch of instructions on how to do this. I think you may also need nss_ldap from PADL.com, but it's doable and I've done it before. You'll also need a "proxy" user with which the authe

Re: [squid-users] corruption symptom[Scanned]

On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:20, Joshua Brindle wrote: > Ok, after looking at LOTS of logs and tcpdumps of the traffic > i finally figured out that when pages or images are broken there > is an extra crlf after the headers. this only happens when using > a cache peer, and happened with both dansguardia

Re: [squid-users] corruption symptom[Scanned]

On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:20, Joshua Brindle wrote: > Ok, after looking at LOTS of logs and tcpdumps of the traffic > i finally figured out that when pages or images are broken there > is an extra crlf after the headers. this only happens when using > a cache peer, and happened with both dansguardia

Re: [squid-users] Re: port 10000[Scanned]

On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 06:14, Norman Zhang wrote: > I'm trying to connect to a webmin/usermin (1/2000) https website with > IE. May I ask do I go around this? Add a couple of rules before the ssl safe_ports deny: acl webmin port 1 2 http_access allow CONNECT webmin Cheers, Rob -- GPG

Re: [squid-users] Re: port 10000[Scanned]

On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 06:14, Norman Zhang wrote: > I'm trying to connect to a webmin/usermin (1/2000) https website with > IE. May I ask do I go around this? Add a couple of rules before the ssl safe_ports deny: acl webmin port 1 2 http_access allow CONNECT webmin Cheers, Rob -- GPG

Re: [squid-users] corruption symptom[Scanned]

On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:20, Joshua Brindle wrote: > Ok, after looking at LOTS of logs and tcpdumps of the traffic > i finally figured out that when pages or images are broken there > is an extra crlf after the headers. this only happens when using > a cache peer, and happened with both dansguardia

Re: [squid-users] SQUID on an LTSP Server[Scanned]

On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:29, Simon Bryan wrote: > Hi all, > I have a number of clients running off an LTSP server An LTSP server is a single IP from squid's point of view. Ident would work, as it's a unix environment. Otherwise authentication is the way to go. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available a

Re: [squid-users] SQUID on an LTSP Server[Scanned]

On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:29, Simon Bryan wrote: > Hi all, > I have a number of clients running off an LTSP server An LTSP server is a single IP from squid's point of view. Ident would work, as it's a unix environment. Otherwise authentication is the way to go. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available a

Re: [squid-users] SQUID on an LTSP Server[Scanned]

On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:29, Simon Bryan wrote: > Hi all, > I have a number of clients running off an LTSP server An LTSP server is a single IP from squid's point of view. Ident would work, as it's a unix environment. Otherwise authentication is the way to go. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available a

Re: [squid-users] Memory leak?[Scanned]

On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 19:50, shpendi wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm running a Squid 2.5.STABLE3 Squid on Redhat 9 linux installed on a dual P4 > 2.4GHz, 3GB RAM and 6xSCSI 320 harddisks. Your cache size is too large. See the FAQ on memory use. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: [squid-users] Memory leak?[Scanned]

On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 19:50, shpendi wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm running a Squid 2.5.STABLE3 Squid on Redhat 9 linux installed on a dual P4 > 2.4GHz, 3GB RAM and 6xSCSI 320 harddisks. Your cache size is too large. See the FAQ on memory use. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: [squid-users] Memory leak?[Scanned]

On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 19:50, shpendi wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm running a Squid 2.5.STABLE3 Squid on Redhat 9 linux installed on a dual P4 > 2.4GHz, 3GB RAM and 6xSCSI 320 harddisks. Your cache size is too large. See the FAQ on memory use. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: [squid-users] Memory leak?[Scanned]

On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 19:50, shpendi wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm running a Squid 2.5.STABLE3 Squid on Redhat 9 linux installed on a dual P4 > 2.4GHz, 3GB RAM and 6xSCSI 320 harddisks. Your cache size is too large. See the FAQ on memory use. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: [squid-users] digest auth TTL[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hello. > when using "digest" scheme to authenticate users, how often external auth program > will be called? > for 'basic" sheme it's "credentialsttl" parameter, what is it for digest? > for me it seems now that overall control is after > "a

Re: [squid-users] digest auth TTL[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hello. > when using "digest" scheme to authenticate users, how often external auth program > will be called? > for 'basic" sheme it's "credentialsttl" parameter, what is it for digest? > for me it seems now that overall control is after > "a

Re: [squid-users] digest auth TTL[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hello. > when using "digest" scheme to authenticate users, how often external auth program > will be called? > for 'basic" sheme it's "credentialsttl" parameter, what is it for digest? > for me it seems now that overall control is after > "a

Re: [squid-users] Squid for Solaris 8 sparc.[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 06:53, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 21.12, Ampugnani, Fernando wrote: > > Is this the last version´s squid for solaris 8 on sparc > > "squid-2.3.STABLE3.tar.gz" ? ^^^ > This is the latest STABLE source version, and works fine

Re: [squid-users] --> Releasing Helper, helperStatefulDefer: Noneavailable[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 22:55, Alex Carlos Braga Antão wrote: > Hello, > I have about 300 users using my cache, 30 NTLM authenticators helpers, and > 10 wb_group > the NTLM average time is 0 msec, and ALL was used at least once, but the > service time is OK. > On cache.log, Im getting lots of t

Re: [squid-users] --> Releasing Helper, helperStatefulDefer: Noneavailable[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 22:55, Alex Carlos Braga Antão wrote: > Hello, > I have about 300 users using my cache, 30 NTLM authenticators helpers, and > 10 wb_group > the NTLM average time is 0 msec, and ALL was used at least once, but the > service time is OK. > On cache.log, Im getting lots of t

Re: [squid-users] digest auth TTL[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hello. > when using "digest" scheme to authenticate users, how often external auth program > will be called? > for 'basic" sheme it's "credentialsttl" parameter, what is it for digest? > for me it seems now that overall control is after > "a

Re: [squid-users] digest auth TTL[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hello. > when using "digest" scheme to authenticate users, how often external auth program > will be called? > for 'basic" sheme it's "credentialsttl" parameter, what is it for digest? > for me it seems now that overall control is after > "a

Re: [squid-users] Squid for Solaris 8 sparc.[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 06:53, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 21.12, Ampugnani, Fernando wrote: > > Is this the last version´s squid for solaris 8 on sparc > > "squid-2.3.STABLE3.tar.gz" ? ^^^ > This is the latest STABLE source version, and works fine

Re: [squid-users] Squid for Solaris 8 sparc.[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 06:53, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 21.12, Ampugnani, Fernando wrote: > > Is this the last version´s squid for solaris 8 on sparc > > "squid-2.3.STABLE3.tar.gz" ? ^^^ > This is the latest STABLE source version, and works fine

RE: [squid-users] Speed of Squid[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 23:27, Alvaro Gordon-Escobar wrote: > Squid was installed to support 70 users > We used to be 100, but then the Ugly "L" word dropped our numbers to 70. Your primary problem is most likely one of: * the use of 'ufs' in your cache_dir line, * Setting cache_mem too high. * Faul

Re: [squid-users] --> Releasing Helper, helperStatefulDefer: Noneavailable[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 22:55, Alex Carlos Braga Antão wrote: > Hello, > I have about 300 users using my cache, 30 NTLM authenticators helpers, and > 10 wb_group > the NTLM average time is 0 msec, and ALL was used at least once, but the > service time is OK. > On cache.log, Im getting lots of t

Re: [squid-users] --> Releasing Helper, helperStatefulDefer: Noneavailable[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 22:55, Alex Carlos Braga Antão wrote: > Hello, > I have about 300 users using my cache, 30 NTLM authenticators helpers, and > 10 wb_group > the NTLM average time is 0 msec, and ALL was used at least once, but the > service time is OK. > On cache.log, Im getting lots of t

RE: [squid-users] Speed of Squid[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 23:27, Alvaro Gordon-Escobar wrote: > Squid was installed to support 70 users > We used to be 100, but then the Ugly "L" word dropped our numbers to 70. Your primary problem is most likely one of: * the use of 'ufs' in your cache_dir line, * Setting cache_mem too high. * Faul

Re: [squid-users] Squid for Solaris 8 sparc.[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 06:53, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 21.12, Ampugnani, Fernando wrote: > > Is this the last version´s squid for solaris 8 on sparc > > "squid-2.3.STABLE3.tar.gz" ? ^^^ > This is the latest STABLE source version, and works fine

Re: [squid-users] Squid for Solaris 8 sparc.[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 06:53, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 21.12, Ampugnani, Fernando wrote: > > Is this the last version´s squid for solaris 8 on sparc > > "squid-2.3.STABLE3.tar.gz" ? ^^^ > This is the latest STABLE source version, and works fine

Re: [squid-users] --> Releasing Helper, helperStatefulDefer: Noneavailable[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 22:55, Alex Carlos Braga Antão wrote: > Hello, > I have about 300 users using my cache, 30 NTLM authenticators helpers, and > 10 wb_group > the NTLM average time is 0 msec, and ALL was used at least once, but the > service time is OK. > On cache.log, Im getting lots of t

RE: [squid-users] Speed of Squid[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 23:27, Alvaro Gordon-Escobar wrote: > Squid was installed to support 70 users > We used to be 100, but then the Ugly "L" word dropped our numbers to 70. Your primary problem is most likely one of: * the use of 'ufs' in your cache_dir line, * Setting cache_mem too high. * Faul

Re: [squid-users] Squid for Solaris 8 sparc.[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 06:53, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 21.12, Ampugnani, Fernando wrote: > > Is this the last version´s squid for solaris 8 on sparc > > "squid-2.3.STABLE3.tar.gz" ? ^^^ > This is the latest STABLE source version, and works fine

Re: [squid-users] --> Releasing Helper, helperStatefulDefer: Noneavailable[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 22:55, Alex Carlos Braga Antão wrote: > Hello, > I have about 300 users using my cache, 30 NTLM authenticators helpers, and > 10 wb_group > the NTLM average time is 0 msec, and ALL was used at least once, but the > service time is OK. > On cache.log, Im getting lots of t

RE: [squid-users] Speed of Squid[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 23:27, Alvaro Gordon-Escobar wrote: > Squid was installed to support 70 users > We used to be 100, but then the Ugly "L" word dropped our numbers to 70. Your primary problem is most likely one of: * the use of 'ufs' in your cache_dir line, * Setting cache_mem too high. * Faul

RE: [squid-users] Speed of Squid[Scanned]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 23:27, Alvaro Gordon-Escobar wrote: > Squid was installed to support 70 users > We used to be 100, but then the Ugly "L" word dropped our numbers to 70. Your primary problem is most likely one of: * the use of 'ufs' in your cache_dir line, * Setting cache_mem too high. * Faul

Re: [squid-users] problem installing squid 3.0 PRE3[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 00:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The configure command runs without error messages, but does not create a > Makefile. Therefore the command "make all" gives: > > Make: Don't know how to make all. Stop. > > Waht is wrong? I'm not sure. The output sure indicat

Re: [squid-users] problem installing squid 3.0 PRE3[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 00:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The configure command runs without error messages, but does not create a > Makefile. Therefore the command "make all" gives: > > Make: Don't know how to make all. Stop. > > Waht is wrong? I'm not sure. The output sure indicat

Re: [squid-users] problem installing squid 3.0 PRE3[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 00:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The configure command runs without error messages, but does not create a > Makefile. Therefore the command "make all" gives: > > Make: Don't know how to make all. Stop. > > Waht is wrong? I'm not sure. The output sure indicat

Re: [squid-users] problem installing squid 3.0 PRE3[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 00:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The configure command runs without error messages, but does not create a > Makefile. Therefore the command "make all" gives: > > Make: Don't know how to make all. Stop. > > Waht is wrong? I'm not sure. The output sure indicat

Re: [squid-users] problem installing squid 3.0 PRE3[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 00:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The configure command runs without error messages, but does not create a > Makefile. Therefore the command "make all" gives: > > Make: Don't know how to make all. Stop. > > Waht is wrong? I'm not sure. The output sure indicat

Re: [squid-users] shoutcast[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 07:27, Bassett, Mark wrote: > Is there any way to allow shoutcast id3 streaming metadata to proxy > through squid? I have an acl set to only allow my pc to connect to the > proxy, and I proxy through irc, shoutcast, etc through the http proxy > tunnel since I am not allowed t

RE: [squid-users] Tweaking Squid for higher performance[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 11:07, Adam Aube wrote: > > diskd is also fine for linux. aufs is only ok on systems with > > kernel threads. > > I didn't mean to imply that diskd doesn't work well on Linux. I was > simply conveying what I had learned from searching the archives > (including several posts b

Re: [squid-users] shoutcast[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 07:27, Bassett, Mark wrote: > Is there any way to allow shoutcast id3 streaming metadata to proxy > through squid? I have an acl set to only allow my pc to connect to the > proxy, and I proxy through irc, shoutcast, etc through the http proxy > tunnel since I am not allowed t

Re: [squid-users] shoutcast[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 07:27, Bassett, Mark wrote: > Is there any way to allow shoutcast id3 streaming metadata to proxy > through squid? I have an acl set to only allow my pc to connect to the > proxy, and I proxy through irc, shoutcast, etc through the http proxy > tunnel since I am not allowed t

RE: [squid-users] Tweaking Squid for higher performance[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 11:07, Adam Aube wrote: > > diskd is also fine for linux. aufs is only ok on systems with > > kernel threads. > > I didn't mean to imply that diskd doesn't work well on Linux. I was > simply conveying what I had learned from searching the archives > (including several posts b

Re: [squid-users] shoutcast[Scanned]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 07:27, Bassett, Mark wrote: > Is there any way to allow shoutcast id3 streaming metadata to proxy > through squid? I have an acl set to only allow my pc to connect to the > proxy, and I proxy through irc, shoutcast, etc through the http proxy > tunnel since I am not allowed t