On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, OTR Comm wrote:
> This seems to imply that the redirect_children are not really unique
> threads from squid, is this correct?
redirect_children has nothing to do with sessions. It simply tells Squid
how many instances of the redirect_program it should invoke. Squid needs 1
Hi All,
I'm having problems getting ntlm authentication to work with squid 2.5
(stable 1). It's running on a RH9 with samba 3.0.
I have winbind working fine with samba but for some reason I just can't
seem to get squid to auth with our win2K domain.
I keep getting 403 access denied messages. Is
You're not passing ntlm_auth any configuration options.. It won't know
if it's doing NTLMSSP, basic or what..
For more info on ntlm_auth - check the man page or have a look here for
a walkthrough:
http://itmanagers.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: MacKenzie, Chris J [mail
Duh ! :-)
Thanks Daniel. Looks like I couldn't see the forest for the trees !
---
Rgds,
Chris MacKenzie
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 24 November 2003 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] NTLM Auth problems
Yo
Dear squiders,
this is Hyun-chul Kim, a graduate student in KAIST, Korea,
who would like to ask a favor to you ;
could we please get a set of access.log files of web cache servers
which is operating in your campus/research institute networks?
currently we're trying to define a bandwidth bottlene
Does any one know if there is any advantage to setting up a BIND
caching-only DNS server on my private network (not registered domain)? I
plan to have my squid box point to it instead of going directly to my ISP's
DNS servers.
I feel that IPCache in Squid serves the same purpose. i.e any DNS entry
If you are using squid as transparent cache, your clients would still need
to do dns lookups. You would be better off with a caching only dns server
unless your clients are configured to use squid as proxy server.
Venkatesh K
- Original Message -
From: "Cafe Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Henrik
>> b) Squid is the worst case application for RAID5 and will absolutely
kill
>> the performance of a RAID5. RAID1 is fine, and so is separate drives.
Do you mean both hardware AND software Raid-5? What's the issue?
Jeff
--
Jeff Richards
Technical Consultant
Unix Enterprise Services
[EMA
does it means that if iam running transparent proxy and running DNS also i
do not need the ip_cache at all ?
Reagrds
Mahmood Ahmed
-
This mail has been sent using Buraak Net's Mailing System
(http://www.buraak.net.pk)
-- Orig
I'm running Suid as a direct proxy-cache. I'll run the DNS on the same box
as Squid.
-Original Message-
From: Venkatesh. K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 9:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Cafe Admin
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid IPCache v. BIND Caching-Only D
Hi All,
We are trying to compile the basic LDAP authenticator for squid against
the SunOne Directory Server 5.2 SDK but seem to have a problem with an
undefined symbol
(Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C 5.3 2001/05/15)
compile errors for squid LDAP authenticator follow
===
Hello All,
SETUP:
I am running squid-2.5.STABLE3 on RH7.3 (2.4.18-4) in a network environment that
also contains a Windows 2000 domain as well as a number of Linux machines.
REQUIREMENTS:
I wish to set up Squid so that it requires authentication. I want Squid to support
NTLM (for any MSIE user
- Original Message -
From: "Mahmood Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Venkatesh. K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Cafe Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid IPCache v. BIND Caching-Only DNS
13 matches
Mail list logo
