Remove my email from your list. Your unsubscribe does'nt work
-Original Message-
From: "Henrik Nordstrom"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 03/04/04 12:50:27
To: "Chris Sprague"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Need help co
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, thors_hammer123 wrote:
> According to the cache.log, there is a fatal error
> trying to open the cache directory. I tried creating
> it manually and it complains that there is no 00
> directory. Why it needs these directories under my
> wife's account but not mine I can't figur
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, M J wrote:
> Example that is working:
>
> authenticate_ttl 3 hour
> authenticate_ip_ttl 60 seconds
> acl ip_unico max_user_ip -s 1
> http_access deny ip_unico
> http_access allow !deny_range !blacklist !download ldapauthentication
>
> Replacement that I have tried but didnt
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, unixware wrote:
> These are Recieve only Satelite links used for web
> traffic only
Ok. Relatively high latency then I suppose.. has some impact on
performance as more connections is needed for the same request rate.
> > Try "downgrading" to a standard Linux-2.4 kernel.
>
>
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> the relevant parts of my squid.conf look like this:
>
>
> auth_param basic program /usr/lib/squid/ldap_auth -b
> ou=people,dc=mhcsoftware,dc=de localhost
> auth_param basic children 5
> auth_param basic realm Squid proxy-caching web server
> aut
Hi,
I am having trouble configuring Squid: When I try to
run Squid under my wife's account, the server aborts
abnormally. I have to SSH to my account and start it
to get it running.
According to the cache.log, there is a fatal error
trying to open the cache directory. I tried creating
it manually
> > How man Mbit/s is your Squid server proxying?
> >
> > 20 Mbit/s ( 2 x 10 links . 2 squid boxes on each
> link
> > )
>
> So approx 10Mbit/s per Squid then?
>
> No other traffic on these links?
These are Recieve only Satelite links used for web
traffic only
> Try "downgrading" to a standar
Once again, many thanks for your help, now I think I understood the concept.
Not trying to abuse, but is there a way to put it into just one line or
max_user_ip must be alone?
Example that is working:
authenticate_ttl 3 hour
authenticate_ip_ttl 60 seconds
acl ip_unico max_user_ip -s 1
http_acces
hi,
the relevant parts of my squid.conf look like this:
auth_param basic program /usr/lib/squid/ldap_auth -b
ou=people,dc=mhcsoftware,dc=de localhost
auth_param basic children 5
auth_param basic realm Squid proxy-caching web server
auth_param basic credentialsttl 2 hours
external_acl_type
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, unixware wrote:
> > How man Mbit/s is your Squid server proxying?
>
> 20 Mbit/s ( 2 x 10 links . 2 squid boxes on each link
> )
So approx 10Mbit/s per Squid then?
No other traffic on these links?
> > I would also make sure all log files including
> > swap.state is on the OS
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, M J wrote:
> I had one acl that some URLs can be accessed without authentication, but
> when I put this acl before the acl max_user_ip users can go through without
> authentication but if I put it after squid just ignore acl and ask for
> authentication. Is that behavior rig
> How man Mbit/s is your Squid server proxying?
20 Mbit/s ( 2 x 10 links . 2 squid boxes on each link
)
> I would also make sure all log files including
> swap.state is on the OS
> drive, and no swap partition.
log files are on OS drive but swap.state is on cache
drive . how i can shift it to
All just one question,
I had one acl that some URLs can be accessed without authentication, but
when I put this acl before the acl max_user_ip users can go through without
authentication but if I put it after squid just ignore acl and ask for
authentication. Is that behavior right ?
Users dont
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Steve wrote:
> The problem is that we have very poor performance, and have a group of
> people taking the shotgun approach to its cause. I've ruled out aliens,
> sun-spots and nostradamus, but I can't refute claims of corrupted cache,
> index issues, etc, because I don't know
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Abdul Khader wrote:
> Can I allocate a specific bandwidth to a perticular
> URL say www.mail.yahoo.com
Not exacly, but close. See delay pools.
Regards
Henrik
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, unixware wrote:
> > a) How many requests/s? (5 min average)
>
> 65-90 req/sec
Ok. A bit but fully in range for what your CPU should be capable of.
> > b) How many open connections? (number of
> > filedescriptors in use)
>
> 2500-3500 open connections
>
> Current File descr
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Chris Sprague wrote:
> I'm a new squid user, and I'm attempting to write my own cache_replacement
> policy. I have it working currently by simple ifdefing in store_repl_lru.c
> file and putting in my own logic. However, I would love to be able to
> create my own source direc
Ralph,
The problem is that we have very poor performance, and have a group of
people taking the shotgun approach to its cause. I've ruled out aliens,
sun-spots and nostradamus, but I can't refute claims of corrupted cache,
index issues, etc, because I don't know enough about squid. I have been
t
Hi All,
Can I allocate a specific bandwidth to a perticular
URL say www.mail.yahoo.com
Regards
Abdul Khader
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Diego Ariel Dasso wrote:
> Hello, is there a relation in performance between the size of
> squid.conf, porn.block, porn.desblock and squid?
Depends on what you have..
> i.e. by eliminatig all comentaries in squid.conf the performance is
> better
No difference. Comments are
Steve,
The good news is that logs show that your cache is fine - all the object
have been validated.
What I wanted to know, however, is where you got the information that your
cache was corrupt. Was this from the logs or from someone (I think Tim asked
you this). Is the cache working at all?
T
21 matches
Mail list logo
