Dear all
have anyone tried using squid on web100 patched
machine
the site says it will improve tcp data transfers and
increase throughput.
more information at
http://www.web100.org
Thanks and Regards
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, ThE LinuX_KiD wrote:
I will lost performance if my Linux box are working
with swapon ?
Disk layout is not relevant.
Yes, you risk loosing performance if you have swap, as the OS then risks
swapping out parts of Squid due to relatively low I/O pressure in certain
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Schelstraete Bart wrote:
If you have A LOT of ACL's, and you're not really familiar with Squid I
think you better to use an external program for this.
Why?
If you have SMP and use a lot of regex acls then yes, at least until Squid
can scale on SMP. But for UP I cannot
Dear all,
I have set up squid to use another proxy by inserting the following lines
into the squid.conf file...
cache_peer 10.0.0.27 parent 8080 0 no-query
prefer_direct off
I expect this to use other proxy i.e.10.0.0.27 unless it is down in whcih
case it can choose an alternative.
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, unixware wrote:
have anyone tried using squid on web100 patched
machine
the site says it will improve tcp data transfers and
increase throughput.
Should work fine, but I doubt it will make any difference for Squid as it
is an optimisation of very high speed networking
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Ordinary Man wrote:
I expect this to use other proxy i.e.10.0.0.27 unless it is down in whcih
case it can choose an alternative. however what squid does is that it sends
some requests to 10.0.0.27 and some directly. Could anyone kindly eplain why
squid si doing this?
Hi Peeps,
I've to implement a solution here. Clients are issued usernames and
passwords which they will use to logon to squid. These usernames/passwords
should be valid for only half an hour. The password has to travel encrypted.
I'm running squid on linux.
To implement this, I have to write a
Should work fine, but I doubt it will make any
difference for Squid as it
What Internet connection do you have? If less than
about 400Mbit/s (40
MByte/s) then web100 is not of any relevance to you,
and if you have I
still doubt it is of any relevance to your Squid
servers..
i dont have
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, unixware wrote:
i dont have such high speed internet connection :(
How big Internet connection do you have?
For i686: export CFLAGS=-O9 -funroll-loops -ffast-math
-malign-double -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions
Is CPU a
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Prash wrote:
To implement this, I have to write a authenticator either (maybe in perl) ..
say digest. Basic is easy but password is not encrypted over the wire. I'm
thinking of storing all the user/passwords in a dbm file and have the
authenticator read it. Time it every
How big Internet connection do you have?
34Mbps Total
20Mbps ( 4 squid boxes proxying )
For i686: export CFLAGS=-O9 -funroll-loops
-ffast-math
-malign-double -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions
Is CPU a bottleneck for you? If not compiler flags
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, unixware wrote:
have anyone tried using squid on web100 patched
machine
the site says it will improve tcp data transfers and
increase throughput.
Should work fine, but I doubt it will make any difference for Squid as
Henrik,
For people who're not used to work with Squid, the ACL's of Squid can be
very tricky. That's such a external programs can help for them.
Regarding performance: Like you said: if you 're using SMP system an
external program can 'improve' the performance if you have a lot of
acl's. Not
I have just set up a very basic installation using the
OpenBSD package squid-2.5.STABLE3p4.
I have installed the squeezer2 log analyzer and it
tells me I am saving only 1% bandwidth.
My host is a 450 MHz with 192 MB RAM. I am using 4
fibre channel drive array.
Here is my simple config:
Peter Matulis wrote:
I have installed the squeezer2 log analyzer and it
tells me I am saving only 1% bandwidth.
My host is a 450 MHz with 192 MB RAM. I am using 4
fibre channel drive array.
Here is my simple config:
Two lines from this are of interest:
cache_dir ufs /var/squid/cache
Thanks for your reply, Henrik.
I've written the authenticator. But the funny thing is my value does not
match the htdigest value?? I've used the md5_hex exactly as you've shown
below. Am I doing something wrong? I've tried md5_base64 as well.
My Value:
perl -e 'use Digest::MD5 qw(md5_hex); my
I do not understand what you mean by is call each time the same client
launch IE.
From what I can see everything looks correct, except maybe that you have
not disabled buffering of stdout. Most languages require you to disable
output buffering in order for the output to reach Squid.
Is there
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Schelstraete Bart wrote:
For people who're not used to work with Squid, the ACL's of Squid can be
very tricky.
To this I agree. And I would very much welcome if someone was interested
in developing a better ACL syntax for Squid which is easier to configure.
Either as a
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Prash wrote:
My Value:
perl -e 'use Digest::MD5 qw(md5_hex); my $value = md5_hex(join(:,
78069102,Cyber,h6VOPgOfY1)); print $value\n;'
4c9a61f233ef81a598b2fe0ce3c3e111
HTDIGEST Value:
$htdigest -c ./me.passwd 78069102 Cyber
Adding password for Cyber in realm
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, unixware wrote:
34Mbps Total
20Mbps ( 4 squid boxes proxying )
So each box is having ca 5, no more than 10 Mbit/s of traffic then?
Regards
Henrik
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
last time I looked at the web100 patch set it was mostly performance
monitoring...
Not really. web100 works by automatic tuning of TCP based on monitoring to
behave better in very high speed networking environments.
But as I say, it is extremely
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Peter Matulis wrote:
cache_dir ufs /var/squid/cache 100 16 256
Shouldn't you have a somewhat bigger cache than 100 MB?
How much HTTP traffic do you have in a week?
Regards
Henrik
--- Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Peter Matulis wrote:
cache_dir ufs /var/squid/cache 100 16 256
Shouldn't you have a somewhat bigger cache than 100
MB?
How much HTTP traffic do you have in a week?
This is for a simple one-man dial-up connection.
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
last time I looked at the web100 patch set it was mostly performance
monitoring...
Not really. web100 works by automatic tuning of TCP based on monitoring to
behave better in very high speed
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Peter Matulis wrote:
This is for a simple one-man dial-up connection.
Currently my /var/squid/cache directory structure
contains only 22 MB.
Ok. For a one-man situation there is not much benefit of a shared cache
such as Squid as your browser already caches things for
ah .. stupid me! I'm embarrassed now.
Thanks for pointing that, Henrik. Great help as usual.
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 April 2004 22:29
To: Prash
Cc: Henrik Nordstrom; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] External Authenticator
One last question tho.
Is it ok for the external digest authenticator to return ERR or should it
always return HA1. If I have to return HA1, then I guess I should make up
some dummy HA1 if I want my auth to fail.
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi,
which is best fileSystem for squid ?
ext2, ext3, XFS, or ReiserFs ?
and which haves better support to aggresive
fails on power supply ?
regards
ThE LinuX_KiD wrote:
Hi,
which is best fileSystem for squid ?
ext2, ext3, XFS, or ReiserFs ?
and which haves better support to aggresive
fails on power supply ?
regards
I will say reiserfs. It is the best, period, with small files.
I've had all the other listed filesystems fail on me,
fire-eyes wrote:
ThE LinuX_KiD wrote:
Hi,
which is best fileSystem for squid ?
ext2, ext3, XFS, or ReiserFs ?
and which haves better support to aggresive
fails on power supply ?
regards
I will say reiserfs. It is the best, period, with small files.
I've had all the other listed filesystems
Dear users
I was start apache in prot 81; configure Squid in port 80 as an httpd
accelerator and as a proxy, and to redirect incoming requests (TCP) for
port 80 to port 81
My site is doing much better in general, however I still want to limit
the ammount of bandwidth per IP.
How can I do
31 matches
Mail list logo
