On 9/30/06, Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fre 2006-09-29 klockan 22:19 -0700 skrev Edward Rosinzonsky:
I also see this in the cache.log file. Don't know what to make of it:
2006/09/29 21:35:25| temporary disabling (Not Found) digest from 127.0.0.1
Either the parent hasn't built
But it's more effective to use the cache directive to block things from
caching. refresh_pattern only applies on pages where there is no
explicit expiry information set by the origin server.
acl page1 urlpath_regex /page1/
cache deny page1
Just tried that. It didn't seem to change anything.
sön 2006-10-01 klockan 02:18 -0700 skrev Edward Rosinzonsky:
On 9/30/06, Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fre 2006-09-29 klockan 22:19 -0700 skrev Edward Rosinzonsky:
I also see this in the cache.log file. Don't know what to make of it:
2006/09/29 21:35:25| temporary
sön 2006-10-01 klockan 02:23 -0700 skrev Edward Rosinzonsky:
Let me reword the problem. I have some pages with http
authentication. When I point my browser directly to the apache
server, they authenticate successfully. When I point it to the squid
that accelerates the apache server,
Hiyas,
Maybe some lines from your cache.log and access.log could help a little.
Anyway, I have scenario like yours, and in my case, squid decided that
it was cheaper to get content from the origin servers, and not from the
sibling caches (I had this server sending ICP
Hello,
I'm using 2.6STABLE3 with WCCPv2 via a Cisco 3550 switch. The switch uses L2
forward and GRE return, which is now working fine (thanks Henrik!).
I'm having trouble getting offline mode to work. In my test setup, I'm
toggling offline mode via cache manager, then shutting off the outside
sön 2006-10-01 klockan 11:25 -0600 skrev Shaun Skillin (home):
I'm having trouble getting offline mode to work. In my test setup,
I'm toggling offline mode via cache manager, then shutting off the
outside Ethernet of my firewall to deny connection to the Internet.
What I see in a capture from
This is what I thought. However, the cache does not return anything to the
client, even any stale content - the cache tries to contact the server just
like it is in online mode. The client browser eventually times-out, with no
content delivered to it.
Could it be that my cache doesn't
Quite likely your http_access rules blocks the digest exchanges. Or you
are running an early 2.6 version where internal requests did not work in
accelerator mode.
which http_access rules can block digest exchanges? Can you give me
an example? I'm running CVS as of this friday.
Also, I see
I took out all the http_access rules, and nothing changed. However,
upon closer examination of access.log, I see UDP_HITS for the static
pages, but UDP_MISS for any url with a ?= in it. Any idea how to
fix that?
On 10/1/06, Edward Rosinzonsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quite likely your
Hi Mernoz,
Yes, it is documented to use the same IP address for eth0 and wccp0, which I
thought was strange too, but apparently helps things.
Router-ID will be the highest IP address on any interface. This is the same
behavior as OSPF, BGP, and other router-id's, but I don't see a way to
My posts bounce back. Here is the message:
ezmlm-reject: fatal: Sorry, a message part has an unacceptable MIME
Content-Type: text/html (#5.2.3)
I am just testing to see if the problem is in the content of the post.
George
sön 2006-10-01 klockan 14:22 -0700 skrev Edward Rosinzonsky:
I took out all the http_access rules, and nothing changed. However,
upon closer examination of access.log, I see UDP_HITS for the static
pages, but UDP_MISS for any url with a ?= in it. Any idea how to
fix that?
First make sure
sön 2006-10-01 klockan 16:14 -0600 skrev Shaun Skillin (home):
Wccp2_router value must be an IP address as far as I know.
It should be the IP of the router interface closest to the cache as this
is the address the router is most likely to respond with when talking to
the cache. If there is a
sön 2006-10-01 klockan 15:34 -0700 skrev George Levy:
My posts bounce back. Here is the message:
ezmlm-reject: fatal: Sorry, a message part has an unacceptable MIME
Content-Type: text/html (#5.2.3)
I am just testing to see if the problem is in the content of the post.
Yes, it is. The
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006, Shaun Skillin (home) wrote:
Hi Mernoz,
Yes, it is documented to use the same IP address for eth0 and wccp0, which I
thought was strange too, but apparently helps things.
Router-ID will be the highest IP address on any interface. This is the same
behavior as OSPF, BGP,
Hi List,
I have gone back to an old issue put aside since April due to time
constraints. The initial mail was Proxying request for a Reverse Proxy
dated 6/4/06 for the curious.
Thanks to Henrik's comments, I was able to mostly succeed in the
following setup:
DNS: Boxes:
That's very good to know, thanks Adrian! I thought it may be an issue
with my switch. It seems to work, just doesn't ever increment.
I have some more info on my original offline_mode issue... It seems that
offline_mode will work on at least one site I have found, and that site
shows up as a
Thanks, that helped!
Don't remember much of the accelerator mode in 2.5, but I can't
remember any reasons why siblings in accelerator mode would not work..
Please try with 2.6. Memory much clearer there, and no interest to dive
back into the 2.5 swamp.
Regards
Henrik
Dear Henrik Tobias,
Thank you so much for your reply. Well, Henrik, the
recommended setting as per in the wiki.squid, it is
already in the current configuration all the while. We
configured it as below, which 5.6 is our IWSS server.
cache_peer 192.168.5.6 parent 8080 0 no-query default
acl all
Well I'm not sure on FC 5 but on FC 4 it does. Try it and get back to me. To
configure the /etc/krb5.conf is quite straight forward open the edit the file
and you'll see what I mean otherwise if you don't know how let me know and I'll
send you copy of my file. Out of interest sake why use NTLM
21 matches
Mail list logo
