Hi Adrian,
So does that mean that there will be no Squid-2.6.19?
Will Squid-2.6.STABLE19 be Squid-2.7.STABLE1 ?
Thanking you...
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, Marcus Kool wrote:
I tried the FAQ and Squid website for some more info but I found none.
The RoadMap2 and RoadMap3 are
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Hi Adrian,
So does that mean that there will be no Squid-2.6.19?
Will Squid-2.6.STABLE19 be Squid-2.7.STABLE1 ?
I'm not aware that the Squid volunteers have ever given a lifetime
for a Squid release. I think, given that its all volunteer work,
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Hi Adrian,
So does that mean that there will be no Squid-2.6.19?
Will Squid-2.6.STABLE19 be Squid-2.7.STABLE1 ?
I'm not aware that the Squid volunteers have ever given a lifetime
for a Squid release. I think, given that its
Hi Klaubert,
It will be useful at my job, thanks for sharing.
[]'s
Thiago
On 1/11/08, Klaubert Herr da Silveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I write a simple Howto for use kerberos to authenticate a user in
Active Directory and make authorization with Ldap also in AD using
group
Oliver Schoett wrote:
Cache-Control: private
Expires: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Sorry, but this is still not optimal. The Expires: date in the past
will also defeat caching by HTTP 1.1 caches. RFC 2616 allows for HTTP
1.1 directives to override the Expires: date of HTTP 1.0 as
I'm just confused and upset, since squid 3.0 was already released
officially, why keeping to release the lower version of squid yet?
Who else is confused about Squid-2 vs Squid-3 btw?
Adrian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Well.
I've had squid-3 in production doing ssl reverse-proxy custom stuff
since 2 years ago. Shame on me, for believing the squid developers when
they said, expect a squid-3 release rsn.
On the c++ front, I submitted code trivially using STL
The decision was made a while ago to not use the STL for various reasons.
These mostly included portability and bugs in the compiler and STL libraries.
I'm guessing that these have mostly been fixed.
Thing is, the STL is great until you need to optimise for performance,
then you need to know a
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008, Matt Benjamin wrote:
I'm happy to see forward movement in any direction. However, I think
it's strongly in the interest of all Squid developers and users to get
together and structure a single road-map to a future that is really
delivered, with frequent incremental
On Jan 14, 2008 8:47 AM, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just confused and upset, since squid 3.0 was already released
officially, why keeping to release the lower version of squid yet?
Who else is confused about Squid-2 vs Squid-3 btw?
Do yu mean Squid 3.0 is based on 2.5
Ok thanks.
btw, what's the difference between these two paramters when compiling squid 3.0?
--enable-storeio=aufs
--with-aio
does 2.7 version support AIO feature?
On Jan 14, 2008 10:03 AM, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, J. Peng wrote:
Do yu mean Squid 3.0 is
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 09:52 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, Marcus Kool wrote:
I tried the FAQ and Squid website for some more info but I found none.
The RoadMap2 and RoadMap3 are a bit vague to draw any conclusions.
Thats because we're developers, not documentation
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
3.x: has some internal code restructuring, is a C/C++ hybrid, includes
integrated ICAP support; Amos has ipv6 support included in 3.HEAD.
IIRC tagged delay pools were merged, definitely per-user delay pools
(class 4 pools) support was
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, Brett Lymn wrote:
I am not sure if the squid project has (or considered) putting their
hand up for the Google Summer of Code. This can give a bit of a cash
injection to the project and, if you are very careful, get someone to
work on some much needed features.
Lack of
Hi Jeffries...
Your thought was incorrect, I still got that message somehow.
The commands
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s !$SQUID -p tcp --dport 80 -j
DNAT --to $SQUID:3128
iptables -A FORWARD -s $SQUID --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
I am using squid brought (by default) from Trustix Secure
var YAHOO = {'Shortcuts' : {}};
YAHOO.Shortcuts.hasSensitiveText = true;
YAHOO.Shortcuts.sensitivityType = [adult];
YAHOO.Shortcuts.doUlt = false;
YAHOO.Shortcuts.location = us;
YAHOO.Shortcuts.document_id = 0;
YAHOO.Shortcuts.document_type = ;
YAHOO.Shortcuts.document_title = Re: [squid-users]
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:40:26PM +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Lack of developer time :)
Ah but if you are careful and get the right person then you get
someone to work on much needed features with a small investment of
developer time - sometimes the person actually continues contributing
to
on your squid box,
pls add below rule.
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j
REDIRECT --to-port 3128
Where did you add below SNAT rule? On squid box or iptables box ?
it should be added to iptables box. NOT to SQUID box.
in addition to that, Your squid box needs
Hi Al
I am facing strange problem with squid proxy version 2.6 STABLE 9 running
on Red HAT Linux AS 4.0 Update 5.0. Some of site are not getting displayed
(e.g. www.sciencedirect.com) even after long time of wait and no error
message is displayed on the browser. We have checked on FIREWALL and
It works here; perhaps you should contact redhat for support with
their packages?
Adrian
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Al
I am facing strange problem with squid proxy version 2.6 STABLE 9 running
on Red HAT Linux AS 4.0 Update 5.0. Some of site are not getting
20 matches
Mail list logo
