> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Marcus Kool
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I wish that the wiki for RIAD is rewritten.
>> Companies depend on internet access and a working Squid proxy
>> and therefore the advocated "no problem if a single disk fails"
>> is not from today's reality.
>> One s
Richard,
RAID0 is considered to have a worse performance than JBOD with 2 disks
with one cache directory per disk. Since you mentioned that you have
to stick with RAID0 all you can do is optimize the RAID0 usage.
Only one cache directory per disk is recommended while you have 4 cache
directorie
I'm quite certain there are performance issues on it but it's a black
box from where I stand and I'm somewhat stuck with it which is why I'm
hoping to poll it for permission and then make direct connections
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Adam Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I disabled the
> I disabled the parent cache and tested the speed and it was a
> remarkable difference.
Performance problems on the parent? Using a parent in another country would
effect latency but shouldn't effect throughput.
> Recently I've spent a fair bit of time benchmarking a Squid system
> whose COSS and AUFS storage (10GB total) + access logging are on a
> RAID0 array of two consumer grade SATA disks. For various reasons, I'm
> stuck with RAID0 for now, but I thought you might be interested to
> hear that the box
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Marcus Kool
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wish that the wiki for RIAD is rewritten.
> Companies depend on internet access and a working Squid proxy
> and therefore the advocated "no problem if a single disk fails"
> is not from today's reality.
> One should als
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Keith M. Richard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using squid 2.6 Stable18 as a Reverse Proxy / Accelerator to my
> internal website. I would like to have it forward the requesting
> client's IP address to the web server and I am unsure how to do this.
You can
Hi , Is there any way I can simply ignore the If-Modify-Since header
that comes in the request to always return 200 OK, with the content
attached ?
Regards, Pablo
Guillaume Chartrand wrote:
Have you solved the forwarding loop?
Nope, If I understand the loop is when my squid box try himself to go to
the web the routeur redirected to himself. Is that means?
That's how I interpret it.
If so, I will try to modify my ACL on my router to not redirec
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 18:13 -0700, Ric wrote:
> > Even then you have the same problem. A public response is a cache hit
> > even if the request carries authentication.
>
>
> Umm... only if it contains a "public" cache control token. That's the
> point of the public token. That's why your back
I am using squid 2.6 Stable18 as a Reverse Proxy / Accelerator to my
internal website. I would like to have it forward the requesting
client's IP address to the web server and I am unsure how to do this.
Thanks,
Keith
Hello all
I run a small squid cache for a high school that due to location and
budget has a very limited internet connection and therefore must try
to conserve bandwidth. The school wishes to have content filtering
enacted to prevent students from accessing inappropriate content while
on school g
Guillaume Chartrand wrote:
I've downgrade my cache_mem to 100M
cache_mem 100 MB
I've modified the cache_dir
cache_dir aufs /usr/local/squid/var/cache 2500 16 256
cache_dir aufs /usr/local/squid/var/cache2 2500 16 256
I've make a make clean on my src dir
I've deleted all file and directory in my
B. Cook wrote:
Hello all,
Still looking at it but it looks like 3.0.1 had no problem with this.
I have squid 3.0.2 with squidguard from FreeBSD ports running on 7.0
and 6.2 and 6.3 and it acted the same way on all of them, went back to
3.0.1 and problem went away.
After I upgraded to 3.0.2
Hello all,
Still looking at it but it looks like 3.0.1 had no problem with this.
I have squid 3.0.2 with squidguard from FreeBSD ports running on 7.0
and 6.2 and 6.3 and it acted the same way on all of them, went back to
3.0.1 and problem went away.
After I upgraded to 3.0.2 and restarted
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Marcus Kool
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Kinkie wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Marcus Kool
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The point of why I started the discussion is that the statement in the
> wiki
> >> "Do not use RAID under any circ
Kinkie wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Marcus Kool
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The point of why I started the discussion is that the statement in the wiki
"Do not use RAID under any circumstances" is at least outdated.
Well, it says: "Don't". Agreed, it's a bit radical. You're welco
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Chris Robertson
>Envoyé : 25 mars 2008 15:41
>À : squid-users@squid-cache.org
>Objet : Re: [squid-users] TCP_HIT and TCP_MISS
>
>Guillaume Chartrand wrote:
>>> -Message d'origine-
>>> De : [EMAIL P
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Marcus Kool
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The point of why I started the discussion is that the statement in the wiki
> "Do not use RAID under any circumstances" is at least outdated.
Well, it says: "Don't". Agreed, it's a bit radical. You're welcome to
edit the
If you are using this as an accelerator, try this in the squid.conf:
acl SAFE_ports port 10020 #random port
http_port 10020 accel vhost vport defaultsite=www.myisp.com
cache_peer [IP of website] parent 10020 0 no-query originserver
name=RPServ
acl ranport myport 10020
cache_peer_access httpsWeb de
The point of why I started the discussion is that the statement in the wiki
"Do not use RAID under any circumstances" is at least outdated.
Most companies will trade in performance for reliability because they depend
on internet access for their business and cannot afford to have 2-48 hours
of u
Hello,
Is there a new x-forwarded-for patch to be used on squid3 ?
I've searching a lot but without success.
In my opinion such a good feature must be added to the squid base
code. It's really helpful especially if you're using a content filter
such as DansGuardian.
TIA,
c0re
--
http://www.
Hi,
i have a strange problem with my squid configuration. We use an internal
squid server to authenticate user requests which then sends all requests
not in his local cache to its upstream squid which then retrieves the
content from the internet. This solution works almost perfect, but in
som
Felix New wrote:
hi all,
i have used aufs file system for a few days and that is very good.
but i encounter a question when i chang the aufs to coss: the cpu load
is very very high(100% nearly) when i rotate the squid access log file
with command 'squid -k rotate', and can not fall down.
Thanks, Chris, Henrik. (Apologies to Henrik; I thought I was replying
to the list, forgot that the default is to reply off-list.)
I think it was my firewall which was causing a lot of the odd
behavior, I hope I have that sorted now...
Chris, regarding the 302 redirection and the use of %s, where
25 matches
Mail list logo
