Have you considered setting squid up to know about both origins, so it
can fail over automatically?
On 26/09/2008, at 5:04 AM, Dave Dykstra wrote:
I am running squid on over a thousand computers that are filtering
data
coming out of one of the particle collision detectors on the Large
Hadr
A squid expert can say whether a squid on your 'B' machine can take a
plain HTTP request from A to B and turn it into an HTTPS request from B
to C. (I don't know, maybe.)
But I suggest you look into "SSH tunneling", and specifically the ssh
"-D" option for setting up a SOCKS proxy.
Then, if
Sebastian Jaurena wrote:
Hi, me again,
I need know if is possible to divide the bandwidth acording the number
of users, and at the same time, any user can't consume more than x
bytes/second.
For example:
I have 1Mb and the max bandwidth allowed is 400Kb/s per user.
1. One user connect to the
Roy M. wrote:
Hello,
Why squid is running as a single thread program, wouldn't it perform
better if allow run as multithreaded as SMP or Quad core CPU are
popular now?
Thanks.
Simply 'allowing' squid to run as multi-threaded is a very big change.
We are doing what we can to work towards it. A
Hello,
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I am a little out of my element
here. Our sysadmin recently left, leaving me in charge of this project.
Basically what we need to do is encrypt a message from our client's server
(we cannot touch their server though) and get it over the public inte
Hello,
I have a file common.js file, which is now being cached by squid 3, e.g.
Sample response
===
Last-Modified[Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:04:34 GMT]
Accept-Ranges[bytes]
Content-Length[27157]
Content-Type[application/x-javascript]
Date[Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:54:30 GM
Hi, me again,
I need know if is possible to divide the bandwidth acording the number
of users, and at the same time, any user can't consume more than x
bytes/second.
For example:
I have 1Mb and the max bandwidth allowed is 400Kb/s per user.
1. One user connect to the proxy, so, this user have a
Hello,
Why squid is running as a single thread program, wouldn't it perform
better if allow run as multithreaded as SMP or Quad core CPU are
popular now?
Thanks.
Amos Jeffries wrote:
negative_ttl wins.
That seems a violation of the intent of section 13.4 of rfc2616,
specifically the "unless" clause of the following sentence which applies
to "any other status code" (despite the limitation of examples to 302
and 307):
# A response received with any o
Thanks Amos,
Detailed explanation and Henrik's response helped us to find the proper
invalidation mechanism.
Cheers,
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 1:01 PM
> To: Christian Tzolov
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cach
Thanks for the useful explanation Henrik!
Cheers,
Chris
Christian Tzolov | Senior Software Developer - Content & Services |
TomTom | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +31 (0)207575451 |
Oosterdoksstraat 114, 1011 DK, Amsterdam
> -Original Message-
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi Amos,
> ... It may be a fixed bug.
Can you provide a link or something so that i can inform myself about
that bug?
Freundliche Grüße,
i.A. Hendrik Pahl
Systemingenieur
--
LWsystems GmbH & Co. KG ++ http://www.lw-systems.de/impressum
Tel: +49 (0)5403 / 5556 ++ Fax: +49 (0)5403 / 7 95 89 97
Hendrik Pahl wrote:
Hi all,
On debian etch, squid 2.6.5-6etch1 installed, were having this problem:
Squid proxy is running on 192.168.0.1 for example. Now, we try surfing
the web and accessing a https-enabled website - squid does not deliver
it. This happens with any browser - firefox 3.0.3 and
Hi all,
On debian etch, squid 2.6.5-6etch1 installed, were having this problem:
Squid proxy is running on 192.168.0.1 for example. Now, we try surfing
the web and accessing a https-enabled website - squid does not deliver
it. This happens with any browser - firefox 3.0.3 and IE7 have been
tested.
Christian Tzolov wrote:
Hi Amos,
Squid would request new data, I believe.
Any time Squid receives new files from an authoritative source it
updates
its cached copy with the new content (except possibly in cases of bug
#7).
I am scared by the "I believe" part :).
Sorry for that. I'm sure c
On tor, 2008-10-02 at 10:57 +0200, Christian Tzolov wrote:
> I am scared by the "I believe" part :).
>
> 1. Can we relay on Squid to always update its cached content if the
> response is newer (e.g. response has new Expires date and no other
> validators)?
Yes.
> 2. Squid does not change/opti
Christian Tzolov wrote:
Hi Amos,
Thanks for your immediate response,
Yes. you can set the peers as siblings and configure the proxy-only
option.
I did that but now I face another problem. How can I make both squid
nodes use the same hostname for their cached object's Keys?
For example th
On tor, 2008-10-02 at 15:57 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we have latest Squid 3 STABLE9 running... this night we saw it dying:
> >
> > 2008/09/30 23:33:27| idnsGrokReply: Malformed DNS response
> > FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying.
> > 2008/09/30 23:33:31| storeDirWriteClean
On ons, 2008-10-01 at 15:42 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I.e., the max-age cache-control directive takes precedence over Expires.
> I've tested Squid and a number of other caches with Co-Advisor, and if
> Expires indicates the response is fresh, but CC: max-age says it's
> stale, it will tr
On tis, 2008-09-30 at 20:15 -0700, Stand H wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose that I have 100GB cache size. Roughly, how much hit rate or
> byte rate can I improve if I increase the size to 500GB? Is larger
> cache better than smaller cache, say 500GB vs 1TB? Suppose I have
> enough RAM.
When the cache has
By default Squid tries to use a parent 10 times before declaring it
dead.
Each time Squid retries a request it falls back on the next possible
path for forwarding the request. What that is depends on your
configuration. In normal forwarding without never_direct there usually
never is more than at
Mark Nottingham wrote:
What version of Squid are you using?
This changed somewhat in 2.7; IIRC in 2.6 negative_ttl overrides
response freshness, whereas in 2.7 response freshness (i.e., expires or
cache-control) has precedence.
Cheers,
On 02/10/2008, at 3:56 PM, Gordon Mohr wrote:
Usin
Hello mates,
Well i have added to separate hard disks (200GB hd and 500GB hd) and added
them in the cache_dir but i noticed that squid Uses the hardisk with MORE
disk space and leaves the second one epmty... why?
another question
lets say the 500GB is full off cache , will squid directly start
Hi Amos,
> Squid would request new data, I believe.
> Any time Squid receives new files from an authoritative source it
updates
> its cached copy with the new content (except possibly in cases of bug
#7).
I am scared by the "I believe" part :).
1. Can we relay on Squid to always update its cach
Hi Amos,
Thanks for your immediate response,
> Yes. you can set the peers as siblings and configure the proxy-only
> option.
I did that but now I face another problem. How can I make both squid
nodes use the same hostname for their cached object's Keys?
For example the same response returned
What version of Squid are you using?
This changed somewhat in 2.7; IIRC in 2.6 negative_ttl overrides
response freshness, whereas in 2.7 response freshness (i.e., expires
or cache-control) has precedence.
Cheers,
On 02/10/2008, at 3:56 PM, Gordon Mohr wrote:
Using 2.6.14-1ubuntu2 in a
26 matches
Mail list logo
