ons 2009-11-25 klockan 05:51 -0800 skrev Landy Landy:
> I also checked netstat -nat and noticed a lot about 1200 of ESTABLISHED
> connections from one ip address.
>
> I called this person and told me no one was using that machine.
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies
>
> Is this a vi
ons 2009-11-25 klockan 18:01 +0300 skrev fedorischev:
> This behavior is typical for one client - he is always downloading something
> from file sharing services e.g. rapidshare etc. In this example FDs
> 23,38,57,67 are occupied by him. I think (correct me if not right), that
> loading is conc
tor 2009-11-26 klockan 22:55 +0100 skrev Sébastien WENSKE:
> Is it something special to do, on the squid box?
You need to tell Squid that the backend web server is trusted with login
credentials (login=PASS argument to cache_peer)
Regards
Henrik
fre 2009-11-27 klockan 16:34 +0300 skrev fedorischev:
> I find that our Squid 3.0 STABLE16 using 80-90% CPU while serving clients,
> who
> using CONNECT method to downloading big files. In any case, standard HTTP
> GET/POST didn't cause the same effect. Any suggestions ?
Odd..
can you set up
tor 2009-11-26 klockan 13:45 -0800 skrev Quin Guin:
> Core was generated by `(squid)'.
> Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
Your squid aborted with an internal error. cache.log SHOULD contain more
information on what the error was.
Regards
Henrik
fre 2009-11-27 klockan 09:08 -0600 skrev Jason Hodges:
> The "Web Content Provider" that serves ringtones, games, etc to our
> subscribers requires that we have an http header inserted as the users
> surf their site. The header is x-msisdn. The value should be the
> subscriber's phone number (md
> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:10:05 -0600
> From: jhod...@pocket.com
> To: marchy...@hotmail.com; squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid HTTP Headers
>
> In our case, we are the carrier. Unfortunately browsers for phones are v
In our case, we are the carrier. Unfortunately browsers for phones are very
antiquated and the less you require them to do, the better off you are. In
fact, they aren't even full blown browsers ... thus the need for a proxy. The
full blown browsers are on "smart phones" and more then 98% of t
> Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid HTTP Headers
> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:46:12 -0600
> From: jhodges
> To: marchy...@hotmail.com; squid-users@squid-cache.org
>
> Today we are paying another company to proxy for our users. They use a
> commercial pr
Today we are paying another company to proxy for our users. They use a
commercial product to accomplish the http header injection.
Unfortunately they charge us a ridiculous amount of money to do what
seems like a simple job.
The header injection needs to occur at the server/gateway/proxy.
Cookies
> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:08:17 -0600
> From: jhodges
> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: [squid-users] Squid HTTP Headers
>
> Hello and thanks for taking the time to read this post. All feedback is
> welcome.
>
> I work for a cell phone
Hello and thanks for taking the time to read this post. All feedback is
welcome.
I work for a cell phone company and we use squid along with some fancy NAT and
PAT in order to offer various proxying services for cell phone web browsers.
Thus far we have been quite successful. If anyone is cu
В сообщении от Friday 27 November 2009 17:16:10 вы написали:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:34 PM, fedorischev wrote:
> > Hi all !!!
> >
> > I find that our Squid 3.0 STABLE16 using 80-90% CPU while serving
> > clients, who using CONNECT method to downloading big files. In any case,
> > standard HTTP
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:34 PM, fedorischev wrote:
> Hi all !!!
>
> I find that our Squid 3.0 STABLE16 using 80-90% CPU while serving clients, who
> using CONNECT method to downloading big files. In any case, standard HTTP
> GET/POST didn't cause the same effect. Any suggestions ?
>
Could you se
Hi all !!!
I find that our Squid 3.0 STABLE16 using 80-90% CPU while serving clients, who
using CONNECT method to downloading big files. In any case, standard HTTP
GET/POST didn't cause the same effect. Any suggestions ?
WBR.
> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:03:06 -0800
> From: jd...@yahoo.com
> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] coredumps on 2.7
>
> From: Quin Guin
>> I am running 2.7-STABALE6 on many squid servers and just recently in the last
>>
From: Quin Guin
> I am running 2.7-STABALE6 on many squid servers and just recently in the last
> few days I am seeing a lot of coredumps. I have most of the coredumps still
> and
> I would like to understand what happened?
> I did search the mailing list and I used gdb to generate a stack tra
17 matches
Mail list logo
