On 20/01/2012 10:41 a.m., darren.trzy...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
I am configuring squid caches to be siblings of each other and have gotten them
to correctly communicate with each other from an ICP perspective and have one
of the caches (B) pull content from another cache (A) that already had
On 20/01/2012 6:02 a.m., Sam Beechey wrote:
Hi All,
I have been configuring a new Squid server today. The original configuration
(without TProxy) worked fine.. DNAT from port 80 to 3128 at squid server..
The source server is where end-users establish a connection, The Squid server
is (10.10.1
On 20/01/2012 1:11 p.m., Tim Fletcher wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:37 -0300, Sebastian muniz wrote:
Reading at squid site, looks like NATting outgoing connections to a
squid running on an other box is not a good idea.
Questions:
What is the suggested way to implement this scenario?
How can I
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:37 -0300, Sebastian muniz wrote:
> Reading at squid site, looks like NATting outgoing connections to a
> squid running on an other box is not a good idea.
> Questions:
> What is the suggested way to implement this scenario?
> How can I get rid of the loop?
I use this scri
I am configuring squid caches to be siblings of each other and have gotten them
to correctly communicate with each other from an ICP perspective and have one
of the caches (B) pull content from another cache (A) that already had the
object cached, but it seems when it pulls this object that it e
ufdbGuard version 1.28 has been released on January 19, 2012.
ufdbGuard is a URL filter for Squid with the following features:
- filter web access based on rules for users, times, website category
- works with free and commercial URL databases
- can enforce SafeSearch for all major search engines
On 2012-01-19 17:37, Sebastian muniz wrote:
Reading at squid site, looks like NATting outgoing connections to a
squid running on an other box is not a good idea.
Questions:
What is the suggested way to implement this scenario?
How can I get rid of the loop?
THanks in advance.
You might look
Hello *
I work at a small ISP. We give non routeable IPs 172.16/12 IPs to most
of our customers, and some of them buys publics IPs from us.
We have a squid box in the public segment of our network
Until now we were NATing at mikrotiks outgoing tcp/80 connections to
the squid public ip ( 200.45.94.2
Hi All,
I have been configuring a new Squid server today. The original configuration
(without TProxy) worked fine.. DNAT from port 80 to 3128 at squid server..
The source server is where end-users establish a connection, The Squid server
is (10.10.10.1) and The Client in question is (10.10.10.1
With using 3.1.18 now and login=PASS instead and added connection-auth=on, both
in cache_peer, Active Sync can be used now.
cache_peer 192.168.100.24 parent 443 0 \
ssl sslflags=DONT_VERIFY_PEER \
sslcert=/etc/ssl/certs/webmail.domain.com.pem
sslkey=/etc/ssl/certs/webmail.domain.
Hi,
When using squid 3.2.0.14, configured with 4 workers, i can see segfault
from one of the workers (don't know why currently).
squid3[6832]: segfault at 7fff4b271ff8 ip 005bb7e1 sp
7fff4b272000 error 6 in squid3[40+3c8000]
Logs are plenty of :
2012/01/19 06:26:07 kid3| varyE
On 19/01/2012 10:13 p.m., Isenberg, Holger wrote:
Is anyone using squid successful as reverse proxy for Outlook Anywhere (RPC
over https) and Active Sync for an Exchange 2010?
Trying to use squid 3.2.0.13 to replace an ISA server forwarding RPC over https
for Outlook Anywhere and Active Sync f
Is anyone using squid successful as reverse proxy for Outlook Anywhere (RPC
over https) and Active Sync for an Exchange 2010?
Trying to use squid 3.2.0.13 to replace an ISA server forwarding RPC over https
for Outlook Anywhere and Active Sync for Outlook mobile devices like Android
and iPhone I
13 matches
Mail list logo
