Hi, I applied the patch but it doesn’t seem to be working. I did a bit of
other testing. I read the bug report and saw that the regression was in
3.1.12, so I tried 3.1.11 and also saw poor results (it actually seemed as if
the occasional packet would have tos set, but not most). For testing
On 26.03.2012 00:53, Ed W wrote:
Hi, I have an upstream cache_peer which requires authentication. My
local network squid accepts explicit proxy clients, and does
transparent redirection on everyone else.
Clearly I can't use the cache_peer for the transparently proxied
clients, however, how coul
Hi Liley,
The only tool I used was AB (Apache Bench), you can use it to generate a lot
of traffic; albeit from a single source IP. So basically you run AB with the
desired number of connections (concurrency) and the maximum number of
requests to send. Take note of the AB output as well as monitor
Hi Clem,
I hav already verified that Windows Vista and 7 talks differently to Exchange.
The patched 3.1.19 build fixed my problem, and also Mac EWS clients seems to
almost work.
I'm waiting for 3.2 STABLE before run new tests on it.
Regards
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l.
Microsoft Silve
Hi, I have an upstream cache_peer which requires authentication. My
local network squid accepts explicit proxy clients, and does transparent
redirection on everyone else.
Clearly I can't use the cache_peer for the transparently proxied
clients, however, how could I use it only for explicit pr
