On 05/06/2012 17:22, Hans Musil wrote:
Eliezer wrote:
one important thing to be aware of is that if you are using the same box
as a gateway and squidbox it's better to use the "redirect" instead of
DNAT.
you can always try to use:
http://nocat.net/downloads/NoCatSplash/
or to write your own h
On 06.06.2012 07:04, Hans Musil wrote:
Ups, an other problem: Amos, your solution looks fine, but there is
one problem. My login/logout script needs to know the client's IP,
but
it only sees my squid's IP. I know, there is format tag %i, but this
would require the non-stable version 3.2. Any b
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 19:54:12 +0200
> Von: "Hans Musil"
> An: Amos Jeffries , squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Caching issue with http_port when running in
> transparent mode
> Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> > On 29/05/2012 6:12 p.m.,
Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 29/05/2012 6:12 p.m., Hans Musil wrote:
> > Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >> On 29.05.2012 08:13, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> >>> hey there Hans,
> >>>
> >>> are you serving squid on the same machine as the gateway is?(wasnt
> >>> sure about the DNAT).
> >>> your problem is not di
> This is where having the proxy doing auth and passing the credentials to the
> peer comes in. The peer never gets to the point of needing to send those
> redirects.
Meaning I have to change Squid or it can be done in configuration?
Thanks,
Will
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Amos Jeffries w
Here is the request this guy is sending. Perhaps, this could shed some light.
..E..dm.@.|...`9.P..].-..#PH..GET.http://www.asd818.com/.HTTP/1.1..Accept:.*/*..Referer:.http://www.asd818.com/..Accept-Language:.zh-cn..Accept-Encoding:.gzip,.deflate..User-Agent:.Mozilla/4.0.(c
Eliezer wrote:
> one important thing to be aware of is that if you are using the same box
> as a gateway and squidbox it's better to use the "redirect" instead of
> DNAT.
>
> you can always try to use:
> http://nocat.net/downloads/NoCatSplash/
>
> or to write your own helper.
> it can be pretty
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
>
> Just SYN_SENT? no TCP connection completed and CONNECT HTTP request
> sent? (all that has to happen *before* the first octet of TLS starts)
>
> Very strange.
>
Indeed there is something strange that I cannot understand.
It seems as if the client sends the request but
On 5/06/2012 7:05 p.m., alextouch wrote:
It is most likely that your clients browsers or SSL libraries are
missing AES-256 support or are getting stuck negotiating to use a
version of TLS/SSL which supports it.
Amos
Ok, but if I turn off proxy setting in clients and allow a direct connection
> It is most likely that your clients browsers or SSL libraries are
> missing AES-256 support or are getting stuck negotiating to use a
> version of TLS/SSL which supports it.
>
> Amos
>
Ok, but if I turn off proxy setting in clients and allow a direct connection
to the internet, all works w
10 matches
Mail list logo
