Em 04-07-2012 22:19, Eliezer Croitoru escreveu:
On 7/4/2012 5:37 PM, Marcio Merlone wrote:
I am administering 3 squid 3.0.STABLE19-1ubuntu0.2 proxies on 3
different sites, and managed to read group membership on LDAP using
external_acl_type and squid_ldap_group without a problem. The last bit I
On 7/5/2012 3:10 PM, Marcio Merlone wrote:
Em 04-07-2012 22:19, Eliezer Croitoru escreveu:
SNIP
the other options are: URL_REWRITE,ICAP,EXTERNAL_ACL.
Didn't know about ICAP. Sounds the way to go.
SNIP
if you are willing to do the testings with me and built some skeleton
for it to fit
Hi all,
Thanks for the responses.
I am using squid 3.1 on Ubuntu 12.04. For now I am just trying to
cache Apache's default it works page, which should be cache able. I
cannot use rebot here since my network is not connected to the
Internet.
I tried to do the configuration from scratch again
Hello,
I'm running squid 3.1.19 in tproxy mode, and I have some customers
complaining that they have problem with stock exchange (share market) sites
and software after implementing the squid. What I saw in the access.log for
one of the customers is:
10.21.8.59 - - [04/Jul/2012:12:01:56 +0530]
Hi all,
Does Squid have an API to query the content of the cache? I am aware
of contentmgr.cgi, but I am looking for an API that I can call from my
code.
Thanks
On 7/4/2012 5:37 PM, Marcio Merlone wrote:
Hi all,
I am administering 3 squid 3.0.STABLE19-1ubuntu0.2 proxies on 3
different sites, and managed to read group membership on LDAP using
external_acl_type and squid_ldap_group without a problem. The last bit I
need to make this a dream proxy cluster
Eliezer == Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il writes:
On 7/5/2012 4:48 AM, Ezequiel Birman wrote:
Amos == Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz writes:
On 04.07.2012 15:54, Ezequiel Birman wrote: Eliezer
== Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il writes: snip
--- On Fri, 7/6/12, Ezequiel Birman stormwa...@espiga4.com.ar wrote:
In http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4#Routing_configuration
I
see rules applied to eth0, should i rewrite br0 in place of
eth0?
I think it should rather be lo.
I did not follow the rp_filter thingie
