On 10/08/2012 5:59 a.m., Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi.
I'm using squid for more than 10 years for now.
I wrote a couple of articles about it.
But there are still some basic things about it that I don't understand.
Or, I don't know, some things about proxy authentication.
I know I will look sill
Hi.
On 10.08.2012 01:10, Rickifer Barros wrote:
Hi squid users,
I have a question about the helper squid_ldap_group whose don't find
in the internet. I'm testing it and I noticed that it don't recognize
groups inside group, but only read users inside group.
The command I'm using is like this:
On 8/08/2012 11:51 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 8/7/2012 10:59 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
mportant changes to note in this release:
* As you should know CVE-2009-0801 security vulnerability protection was
added in 3.2 series.
Earlier betas attempted to protect peer caches as well as themselv
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> I'm trying squid 3.2 (since I'll need some of the new features), but I'm
>> having troubles using it in intercept mode, when used along with an
>> upstream proxy.
>
> Which 3.2 release number please? that matters a LOT.
Pardon; it was a 3.
Hi squid users,
I have a question about the helper squid_ldap_group whose don't find
in the internet. I'm testing it and I noticed that it don't recognize
groups inside group, but only read users inside group.
The command I'm using is like this: external_acl_type AD_GROUP %LOGIN
/usr/lib/squid3/s
Hi.
I'm using squid for more than 10 years for now.
I wrote a couple of articles about it.
But there are still some basic things about it that I don't understand.
Or, I don't know, some things about proxy authentication.
I know I will look silly, but I still decided to ask.
I decided to ask here
Hi
Apparently I'm having the exact same issue as Michael was in this thread:
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/201204/0016.html
Differences are:
- I'm using 3.1.20
- I'm using CentOS 6.3 with openssl-1.0.0-20
- I'm building an RPM via mock
This is the configure section from the
On 10/08/2012 12:35 a.m., nipun_mlist Assam wrote:
Fixed the compilation issue. I guess it is safe to use the check "#if
OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x1003L" instead. This check is there
in many files. I modified only certificate_db.cc. If we know the exact
openssl version from where these lha
Fixed the compilation issue. I guess it is safe to use the check "#if
OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x1003L" instead. This check is there
in many files. I modified only certificate_db.cc. If we know the exact
openssl version from where these lhash, safestack etc. headers got
modified, then this ch
Hi Amos,
OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER is 0x1003L
I replaced (in certificate_db.cc)
#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x104fL
with
#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x1003L
.
Now I get the below problem: (compiler used is g++ (GCC) 4.4.4
20100726 (Red Hat 4.4.4-13) )
certificate_db.cc: In member fu
On 09.08.2012 20:04, nipun_mlist Assam wrote:
Hi All,
I am facing compilation problem with squid 3.2.0.19. This fails
because of some changes in openssl header lhash.h (generally installs
in /usr/icnlude/openssl/lhash.h).
I used openssl 1.0.0 (OpenSSL 1.0.0-fips) for building squid.
The lhash.h
Markus Moeller moeller.plus.com> writes:
>
> Hi Viorel,
>
>What you mean with a list of high load sites ? Are you saying that the
> performance depends on which sites you are accessing via squid ?
>
> Regards
> Markus
>
It's because of my pour english, I meant that I can easely simulate
Hi All,
I am facing compilation problem with squid 3.2.0.19. This fails
because of some changes in openssl header lhash.h (generally installs
in /usr/icnlude/openssl/lhash.h).
I used openssl 1.0.0 (OpenSSL 1.0.0-fips) for building squid.
The lhash.h header has slightly different macros in openssl
13 matches
Mail list logo
