On 18/08/2012 2:28 a.m., Osmany Goderich wrote:
Sorry about that everyone. I know that repeating post is annoying. It was
just a little mistake.
Apologies.
Osmany
Is this about the repeats?
Or did you notice that cache_peer 10.25.x.x parent 80 is sending *all*
traffic as HTTP for the
On 19/08/2012 4:06 a.m., Will Roberts wrote:
On 08/18/2012 08:02 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Bennett Haselton
benn...@peacefire.org wrote:
I installed squid 3.1.10 on CentOS 6.3 with the default squid.conf.
When I test it out from localhost:
The following error
On 19/08/2012 5:58 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
SNIP
I wasn't sure that I got it right but it seems like my logic was right
after all.
But if anyone do use firewall + intercept proxy he will most likely
will manage the proxy acls to match the local security policy else
then the firewall.
On 19/08/2012 8:42 a.m., Abhishek Chanda wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to force squid to cache an object? I am trying to do
this, a client and an apache server communicates. At some intermediate
point in the path, the response from Apache will be split and one copy
will go to the client, one to
On 19/08/2012 3:39 p.m., 叶雨飞 wrote:
Today I noticed,sometime I visit
http://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php/DF2012:Large_pot sometime squid
will return the webpage as a downloadable .gz file
any idea what's going on?
Squid returns what the web server gives it.
On 18/08/2012 12:09 p.m., Ricardo Rios - Shorewall List wrote:
El 2012-08-17 18:01, Ricardo Rios escribió:
On 17/08/12 14:43, Kinkie wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Ricardo Rios - Shorewall List
shorew...@malargue.gov.ar [1] wrote:
I am trying squid 3.2.1 in a opensuse 11.4 Box,
My goal is to make suid as transparent proxy. I see several options.
Not sure which one I should be using. I am looking for standard
transparent proxy server.
--enable-ipfw-transparent or --enable-ipf-transparent or --enable-pf-transparent
Thanks in advance
On 8/19/2012 10:00 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
My goal is to make suid as transparent proxy. I see several options.
Not sure which one I should be using. I am looking for standard
transparent proxy server.
--enable-ipfw-transparent or --enable-ipf-transparent or --enable-pf-transparent
debian/2.6.26-2-686
Thanks for your help
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il wrote:
On 8/19/2012 10:00 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
My goal is to make suid as transparent proxy. I see several options.
Not sure which one I should be using. I am looking for
On 8/19/2012 10:18 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
debian/2.6.26-2-686
Thanks for your help
Then ip|ipfwipf in not of your concern.
you need linux-netfilter.
Regards,
Eliezer
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer at ngtech.co.il
I have been checking out about IMDB videos and it seems like the
original requests cannot be cached from an unknown reason.
the store log shows:
1345335832.436 RELEASE -1 B174D16A30640884673D882B55B3594C 200
1334135877 1302715098-1 video/mp4 16586249/16586249 GET
On 20.08.2012 10:10, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
I have been checking out about IMDB videos and it seems like the
original requests cannot be cached from an unknown reason.
the store log shows:
1345335832.436 RELEASE -1 B174D16A30640884673D882B55B3594C
200 1334135877 1302715098-1
On 8/20/2012 1:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The is the file number/name where it is being stored. Since
this is an erased operation that is always the magic F value.
It is not 1-to-1 related to the object being cacheable. It just means
the object *currently* stored needs removing.
On 8/20/2012 2:37 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 8/20/2012 1:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The is the file number/name where it is being stored. Since
this is an erased operation that is always the magic F value.
It is not 1-to-1 related to the object being cacheable. It just means
the
On 20.08.2012 11:37, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 8/20/2012 1:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The is the file number/name where it is being stored. Since
this is an erased operation that is always the magic F value.
It is not 1-to-1 related to the object being cacheable. It just
means
the
On 20.08.2012 12:22, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 8/20/2012 2:37 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 8/20/2012 1:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The is the file number/name where it is being stored.
Since
this is an erased operation that is always the magic F value.
It is not 1-to-1 related
On 8/20/2012 4:03 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
If you wish. It is a minor regression for the use-cases where traffic is
being fetched from sources other than ORIGINAL_DST. That content should
still be cacheable as it was before. It is done this way for now so that
swapping ORIGINAL_DST in for
On 8/20/2012 3:45 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Two possibilities:
1) Did you bump up the maximum_object_size? default being 4MB and these
objects are ~16MB.
my limit is 200MB
2) They are dynamic objects without any Cache-Control or Expires header
to explicitly state the cacheability age. That
18 matches
Mail list logo
