Re: [squid-users] internal website directly

2012-09-06 Thread Maurizio Marini
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:34:04 +0200 nicola gentile wrote: > Is it possible? yes, I use wpad to do it, but maybe thare are ways -m smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [squid-users] internal website directly

2012-09-06 Thread nicola gentile
Is it possible to use squid for redirect instead of wpad or proxy.pac? Thanks Nick 2012/9/6 Jason Leschnik : > if (dnsDomainIs(host, "mydomain.com") || isPlainHostName(host)) { > > return "DIRECT"; > > } > > This is what i use on my home network to bypass my proxy via my proxy auto > config > >

[squid-users] Impressions of 3.2.1

2012-09-06 Thread Daniel Beschorner
Congratulations on the 3.2 release! It seems quite stable in our >1000 client environment, good work! Some first impressions after using it for some days (Linux x64, no disk cache, SMP mode with 2 workers): On an old server (SLES 10) the load sharing between workers (2 or 4) is pretty bad, in f

Re: [squid-users] internal website directly

2012-09-06 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
It depends on the environment. if the internal server goes through a router you can put the squid box after the router or to replace it with and intercept the requests but it's the less recommended method. Regards, Eliezer On 9/6/2012 3:03 PM, nicola gentile wrote: Is it possible to use squi

Re: [squid-users] Generell Squid setup

2012-09-06 Thread Farkas H
Hi Amos, thanks for your response. I modified the web application. Now we have the following infrastructure. client --> http-Post [embedded http-Get] --> Server / web application --> http-Get --> Squid -> Servers (-> Squid -> Server / web application -> client) Advantage: The Server / web applicat

[squid-users] sending only cache_hits to icap AV

2012-09-06 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
Hi all, We have the following proxy structure at the moment: Internet --- Squid cache1 --- Squid cache2 --- users | ICAP Anti Virus server The documentation of the AV server states clearly that they don't recommend having a caching proxy behind it because the

Re: [squid-users] Impressions of 3.2.1

2012-09-06 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 7/09/2012 2:54 a.m., Daniel Beschorner wrote: Congratulations on the 3.2 release! It seems quite stable in our >1000 client environment, good work! Some first impressions after using it for some days (Linux x64, no disk cache, SMP mode with 2 workers): On an old server (SLES 10) the load sh

RE: [squid-users] Impressions of 3.2.1

2012-09-06 Thread Sunil K.P.
Greetings, For migrating to 3.1 to 3.2 did you have to reinitialize the squid dir. Had tried to move from 3.1 to 3.2 a couple of times but was unsuccessful. There were frequent "FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying." messages . Rgds, Sunil -Original Message- From: Daniel Beschorner