[squid-users] Implementing SslBump using Bump-Server-First in Transparent mode using squid-3.HEAD-20121231-r12554

2012-12-31 Thread Swapneel Patnekar
Hello Everyone, I've successfully managed to configure sslbump with squid-3.HEAD-20121231-r12554. However, I am having troubles in configuring SslBump using Bump-Server-First in Transparent mode. Basically I don't think I have the correct set of directives/configuration parameters in

Re: [squid-users] tcp_outgoing_tos doesn't work in 3.2?

2012-12-31 Thread Nick Rogers
FWIW I've created a bug report. http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3731 So far the patch I mentioned has worked beautifully on my production machines. On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 29/12/2012 3:49 p.m., Andrew Beverley wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 18:

Re: [squid-users] Implementing SslBump using Bump-Server-First in Transparent mode using squid-3.HEAD-20121231-r12554

2012-12-31 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
to configure sslbump with squid-3.HEAD-20121231-r12554. However, I am having troubles in configuring SslBump using Bump-Server-First in Transparent mode. Basically I don't think I have the correct set of directives/configuration parameters in squid.conf to check/test SslBump using Bump-Server-

Re: [squid-users] Implementing SslBump using Bump-Server-First in Transparent mode using squid-3.HEAD-20121231-r12554

2012-12-31 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 1/01/2013 12:33 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote: Hey, From this basic snippet of the email I can tell you: 1. using DNAT is wrong anyway for intercept proxy. 2. specifically for SSL-BUMP it's ^^^ the cause of most of your problems. Since SSL-BUMP tries to to bump server first it should be able

Re: [squid-users] Transparent Squid on OpenVZ container?

2012-12-31 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 30/12/2012 10:55 p.m., Tim Bates wrote: Has anyone had experiences with running Squid *transparently* on an OpenVZ container in combination with a Cisco router? Can it be done? Is there anything to watch out for, or any tricks? TB Which definition of "transparent" are you trying to achieve

Re: [squid-users] Implementing SslBump using Bump-Server-First in Transparent mode using squid-3.HEAD-20121231-r12554

2012-12-31 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Sorry my bad, If it's on the same machine then it should be fine. if on other it's another story. on what machine is it? these rules? Thanks, Eliezer On 1/1/2013 7:14 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > No. DNAT and REDIRECT do the same thing and both are valid for Squid > with NAT intercept. > > REDIRE

Re: [squid-users] Implementing SslBump using Bump-Server-First in Transparent mode using squid-3.HEAD-20121231-r12554

2012-12-31 Thread Swapneel Patnekar
Eliezer & Amos, Thank you for your input & assistance. The iptables rules are on the same machine in which I'm running squid. Amos, just for my understanding changing the below given directive should do the trick ? ssl_bump client-first all to ssl_bump server-first all On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 a

Re: [squid-users] Implementing SslBump using Bump-Server-First in Transparent mode using squid-3.HEAD-20121231-r12554

2012-12-31 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 1/01/2013 7:19 p.m., Swapneel Patnekar wrote: Eliezer & Amos, Thank you for your input & assistance. The iptables rules are on the same machine in which I'm running squid. Amos, just for my understanding changing the below given directive should do the trick ? ssl_bump client-first all to