On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
jc.yin jc.yin...@gmail.com wrote:
So does this mean that now that I have increased 100 to 15000, the
cache directory is now 15000MB right?
yup, that outta work pretty good on that 30gb partition
sorry for my mistake earlier bout the 100k thing, it is
Hi.
I use caches in a corporate environment and their most purpose is
authorization and accounting, so I use various AD-authorization schemes.
Recently I switched most of my proxies to squid 3.2.x, and got a
problem. The problem appears on various upload sites across the internet
(you know, like
Network or kernel level.
You can try to look at the MTU and other stuff.
to make sure there is no DNS interception etc.
For me it seems like a network issue.
If it's a network issue, could you be any more specific as far as what
to look for? 3.3.8 might be a bit better but that could be my
I would like to hear your advice about kerberos auth configuration on a
new installation.
This will be an installation with two redundant Linux based servers,
clients will be mostly windows joined to active directory, with AD users
logged in. The main focus of the installation is
I've noticed that in order to get TCP_IMS_HIT's to display, I have to:
1. Load for the first time the target page
2. Refresh my browser
3. Have TCP_IMS_HIT displayed
If I simply:
1. Load for the first time the target page
2. Navigate to another page
3. Navigate back to first page
I just get a
haha no problem at all. Anyway when you said that 100 was clearly not enough,
it got me thinking and I went ahead and changed the cache size, which seemed
to have solved a few small issues :)
Thanks for the tip anyway :D
--
View this message in context:
Hi
Any hints/answers concerning the icap_preview_size with the current
squid (3.3.7/3.3.8)?
Thanks a lot.
Tom
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Tom Tom tomtux...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Concerning the following post:
On 07/15/2013 06:14 PM, Grant wrote:
Network or kernel level.
You can try to look at the MTU and other stuff.
to make sure there is no DNS interception etc.
For me it seems like a network issue.
If it's a network issue, could you be any more specific as far as what
to look for? 3.3.8
On Monday 15 July 2013 at 19:32:10, jc.yin wrote:
I've noticed that in order to get TCP_IMS_HIT's to display, I have to:
1. Load for the first time the target page
2. Refresh my browser
3. Have TCP_IMS_HIT displayed
If I simply:
1. Load for the first time the target page
2. Navigate
So how would I know if squid is really caching and then serving contents
instead of the browser? Does this mean that, between Squid's own cache in
RAM as well as the browser's own cache, there wouldn't be much content saved
to Squid's disk cache?
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
jc.yin jc.yin...@gmail.com wrote:
So how would I know if squid is really caching and then serving
contents instead of the browser? Does this mean that, between Squid's
own cache in RAM as well as the browser's own cache, there wouldn't
be much content
Hi all,
I'm having a problem getting squid to select the upstream proxy based on
the source address set in the X-Forwarded-For header.
Here is the appropriate lines from my squid.conf:
follow_x_forwarded_for allow all
acl forwardTrafficSubnet1 src 172.21.120.0/24
cache_peer 172.21.120.24 parent
I tried the method, but the thing is, I'm using a remote ubuntu server to
test Squid and as a result I probably won't be seeing the results like you
described, since that most likely requires a local server. However it does
seem to load a bit faster, but not that much since its still fetched from
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
jc.yin jc.yin...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried the method, but the thing is, I'm using a remote ubuntu
server to test Squid and as a result I probably won't be seeing the
results like you described, since that most likely requires a local
server. However it
Haha I'm doing this for a client but having had to research all about Squid
the past week, I'm thinking of setting up my own as well :p
I think tomorrow I'll just set up a local Squid server to test out the
results. In the mean time I'll upload the squid.config file like Amos
suggested as soon
Okay so here is the dropbox link for my squid.conf file, please have a look
and tell me if any of my settings are screwing things up.
Thank you so much!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2nc1mfm3npm7g1p/squid.conf
--
View this message in context:
Network or kernel level.
You can try to look at the MTU and other stuff.
to make sure there is no DNS interception etc.
For me it seems like a network issue.
If it's a network issue, could you be any more specific as far as what
to look for? 3.3.8 might be a bit better but that could be
I have here a working scenario with Squid using ntlm + ldap_groups to
make single sign on plus access control based in wich Active Directory
group user is.
But, have anyone done any experience with Samba4? Then I think I cold
replicate Microsoft Active Directory data with Samba and make the auth
On 16/07/2013 2:10 a.m., Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi.
I use caches in a corporate environment and their most purpose is
authorization and accounting, so I use various AD-authorization schemes.
Recently I switched most of my proxies to squid 3.2.x, and got a
problem. The problem appears on
19 matches
Mail list logo
