Thank You for Your reply. I have identified a name resolving issue so far.
I'm not sure however, what should be in acl localhost src and acl
localnet src.
Peter
Dňa 20.09.2013 05:09, Amos Jeffries wrote / napísal(a):
> On 17/09/2013 6:24 p.m., Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
>> .Via: */
>> 0x31, 0
On 15/09/2013 7:24 a.m., don...@infomed.sld.cu wrote:
Hello
I trying to use squid_ldap_auth with zimbra accounts but I?m having a
lot of troubles. Before, I use a line like this from shell to confirm
an OK auth against and LDAP server:
/usr/lib/squid3/squid_ldap_auth -v 3 -b dc=cpe,dc=com -
On 15/09/2013 7:54 a.m., Ralph LoBianco wrote:
Hi, Right now I have squid setup with Multiple IPS and its working fine like
this.
acl ip1 myip 192.168.1.101
acl ip2 myip 192.168.1.102
acl ip3 myip 192.168.1.103
acl ip4 myip 192.168.1.104
acl ip5 myip 192.168.1.105
acl ip6 myip 192.168.1.106
No
On 20/09/2013 3:55 p.m., psd17j-jacob wrote:
Where is this bridge sitting in the network level?
please share your situation in more details.
Sure! So we have the NOC MDF > proxy (in through eth0) //bridge (out eth1)
router > ComCast.
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
The proxy operates on top of the *ro
>Where is this bridge sitting in the network level?
>please share your situation in more details.
Sure! So we have the NOC MDF > proxy (in through eth0) //bridge (out eth1)
>router > ComCast.
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
> The proxy operates on top of the *routing* component of the kernel. As
> you c
On 20/09/2013 5:35 a.m., psd17j-jacob wrote:
Hi Antony,
Thanks for the reply. So what would be your suggestion in terms of creating
a transparent proxy across multiple VLANs without bridging? All VLANs are
public routable IPs except for two, one being the publicly available WiFi.
The school enco
On 19/09/2013 1:29 a.m., John McGowan wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Alfredo Rezinovsky
wrote:
El 16/09/13 18:35, John McGowan escribió:
squid defaults connect_retries to 0
try setting it to something and see if the 503 errors frequency are lower
with this.
I remember looking at that
On 17/09/2013 6:24 p.m., Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
.Via: */
0x31, 0x2e, 0x30, 0x20, 0x6c, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x61, /* 1.0 loca */
0x6c, 0x68, 0x6f, 0x73, 0x74, 0x20, 0x28, 0x73, /* lhost
Your Squid is for some reason identifying its *public* domain name as
"localhost".
This has bitten a few peopl
On 15/09/2013 10:44 p.m., Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 14/09/2013 6:28 a.m., Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I'm trying to get analysis tools on squid, but I'm having trouble due
to -Werror. -Werror is causing a continuous stream of compile and link
fai
Hey Sachin Gupta,
what you are asking is basically related to "requests mangling" which is
not the best way to do what you need.
I assume that matching and insert is kind of filtering or mangling.
The best option I have seen is ICAP and it's a very simple mechanism.
the solution is based on the n
Hey there,
You got a clue on how to do what you want but the question I am asking
myself is: "what is this needed for??"
Regards,
Eliezer
On 09/19/2013 09:48 PM, Peter Belau wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to add a configuration derive to Squid by modifying cf.data.pre
> My addition looks like
On 09/19/2013 08:35 PM, psd17j-jacob wrote:
> All VLANs are
> public routable IPs except for two
Where is this bridge sitting in the network level?
please share your situation in more details.
Once we can know more we can suggest more.
you have only wrote about a specific "case" in hands which doe
On 09/19/2013 12:48 PM, Peter Belau wrote:
> I'm trying to add a configuration derive to Squid by modifying cf.data.pre
> My addition looks like this:
>
> NAME: scrly_internal_ip_address
> TYPE: string
> LOC:
> Config.scrly_internal_ip_address
> DEFAULT: none
> DOC_START
> DOC_END
>
>
> However
Hi,
I'm trying to add a configuration derive to Squid by modifying cf.data.pre
My addition looks like this:
NAME: scrly_internal_ip_address
TYPE: string
LOC:
Config.scrly_internal_ip_address
DEFAULT: none
DOC_START
DOC_END
However, when I attempt to build Squid I get the following error:
In
On Thursday 19 September 2013 at 19:02:26, psd17j-jacob wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I am attempting to filter a school's internet connection using DG +
> Squid + Bridging for a transparent proxy.
Is there any particular reason you've included Bridging in the above setup?
It's certainly not needed f
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> ...
> If your clients are RFC 5280 compliant (such as a web browser), then
> here are the guides:
>
> Baseline: https://www.cabforum.org/Baseline_Requirements_V1_1_6.pdf
> Extended Validation: https://www.cabforum.org/Guidelines_v1_4_3.pdf
Hi all,
So I am attempting to filter a school's internet connection using DG + Squid
+ Bridging for a transparent proxy. The bridge is up and working as br0.9.
Squid is running at 3128 and DG is running at 8080.
For IPTables I have the following rules:
-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 3128
Hi Antony,
Thanks for the reply. So what would be your suggestion in terms of creating
a transparent proxy across multiple VLANs without bridging? All VLANs are
public routable IPs except for two, one being the publicly available WiFi.
The school encourages BYOD so sending out proxy settings via G
18 matches
Mail list logo
