hi ,
using centos 6.4 , im just asking about the best kernel used to support
tproxy after compilation ??
i used 3.7.5 and its fine , i want to ask if there is better kernels
tested from some users here and they can advice me to use it :)
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context
thanks guys for your reply
i authenticate my users by digest and want to limit them by check their total
using of bandwidth.
Is it possible to use the output of one of log analysis softwares?
On Monday, October 21, 2013 2:23 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 21/10/2013 11:30 p.m., ana any wrote:
hi all ,
actually im asking about squid & squid 3 that are running at the same time
under ubuntu or debian OS,
my question is ,
can we get benefit from doing this ???
can we get benefit of multi cpu cores of squid by this method without using
SMP ??
if no ,
what is the benefit of using bot
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/IPv6#NAT_Interception_Proxy_.28aka_.22Transparent.22.29
"NAT simply does not exist in IPv6. By Design."
This is no longer true as of Linux 3.7 + IPTables 1.4.17.
I wanted to introduce a transparent caching web proxy on my network,
however most of my clients a
Hallo, ana,
Du meintest am 22.10.13:
> thanks guys for your reply
> i authenticate my users by digest and want to limit them by check
> their total using of bandwidth. Is it possible to use the output of
> one of log analysis softwares?
As I had recommended some hours ago: "squish"
Viele Grue
Hi Ahmad,
Please see replies to your question inlined:
On 10/22/2013 11:29 AM, Ahmad wrote:
hi all ,
actually im asking about squid & squid 3 that are running at the same time
under ubuntu or debian OS,
my question is ,
can we get benefit from doing this ???
I don't think so? Is there any s
Hello,
I am using Squid 3 with MyDLP.
My settings are as follows:
icap_enable on
icap_io_timeout 30 minutes
icap_preview_enable off
adaptation_send_client_ip on
icap_service service_req reqmod_precache bypass=on
icap://192.168.168.192:1344/dlp
adaptation_access service_req allow all
When I tak
W dniu 2013-10-22 16:52, PS pisze:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Squid 3 with MyDLP.
>
> My settings are as follows:
> icap_enable on
> icap_io_timeout 30 minutes
> icap_preview_enable off
> adaptation_send_client_ip on
> icap_service service_req reqmod_precache bypass=on
> icap://192.168.168.192:1344/
Hi everyone when trying to run /usr/bin/ntlm_auth
--helper-protocol=squid-2.5-basic domain+user password all it does is
just hang and does not give me an OK response. I have checked the
winbind logs and can't see anything. Any ideas?
Thanks
Eric Vanderveer
I just upgraded from 2.7 to 3.1.19. It runs fine, but
the /var/spool/squid3/ directory is empty. A "squid3 -z" tells it has
created the swap directories, but in fact the dir remains empty:
# squid3 -z
2013/10/22 19:20:50| Creating Swap Directories
# ls -al /var/spool/squid3/
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2
On 10/22/2013 11:27 AM, richard lucassen wrote:
> I just upgraded from 2.7 to 3.1.19. It runs fine, but
> the /var/spool/squid3/ directory is empty. A "squid3 -z" tells it has
> created the swap directories, but in fact the dir remains empty:
>
> # squid3 -z
> 2013/10/22 19:20:50| Creating Swap Di
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:43:05 -0600
Alex Rousskov wrote:
> > I just upgraded from 2.7 to 3.1.19. It runs fine, but
> > the /var/spool/squid3/ directory is empty. A "squid3 -z" tells it
> > has created the swap directories, but in fact the dir remains empty:
> >
> > # squid3 -z
> > 2013/10/22 19:2
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:35:39 +0200
richard lucassen wrote:
> One other question, I'm certainly not a squid guru: I'd like to use
> squid/squidGuard on an internal ipv4 network and provide ipv6 sites to
> ipv4-only clients, let's call it an "ipv6-to-ipv4 converter". Is that
> possible? Same search
hi all ,
@baba jaja
thanks alot for reply
does that mean it is only for squid 2.7 ???
plz give me documentation about that .
can i do it in 3.3.x ??
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-squid3-running-at-the-same-
HI ALL ,
i have an idea ,
i have squid with tproxy and with squidguard .
all we know that webfiltering is not strong becuase it needed to be updated
frequently ,
i also have dns server inside , and i began to think how to strenthen the
web filtering
i found that if i configured my dns with N
On 23/10/2013 12:21 a.m., Mike Cardwell wrote:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/IPv6#NAT_Interception_Proxy_.28aka_.22Transparent.22.29
"NAT simply does not exist in IPv6. By Design."
This is no longer true as of Linux 3.7 + IPTables 1.4.17.
I wanted to introduce a transparent caching web
On 22/10/2013 9:31 p.m., Ahmad wrote:
hi ,
using centos 6.4 , im just asking about the best kernel used to support
tproxy after compilation ??
i used 3.7.5 and its fine , i want to ask if there is better kernels
tested from some users here and they can advice me to use it :)
Any kernel 2.
On 22/10/2013 1:52 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Not comparing any language or anything but I am trying to merely
trying to find more cache proxy else then squid and varnish for http
which are opensource.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_server#Web_proxy_servers
Amos
On 22/10/2013 2:56 p.m., Dan Charlesworth wrote:
Hi folks
I've been testing these interception methods (as outlined in the Config
Examples) and don't really understand the difference between the two, other
than DNAT requiring sysctl changes.
What's the actual functional difference?
Iptable
Very edifying. Thanks so much for that Amos.
While the thread’s going, would you be able to elaborate at all on the
“trickery with multiple rules and IPs”?
On 23 Oct 2013, at 5:10 pm, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 22/10/2013 2:56 p.m., Dan Charlesworth wrote:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I've been testing t
On 20/10/2013 8:13 a.m., Jermster wrote:
I need some help plz.
- I'm running Windows XP Home Edition
- I have a SMC8014WN Modem
- I'm assigned a WAN address from my SP
- I currently have Squid 2.5.4.0
NP: squid-2. is extremely old. Please get a squid-2.7 version from
http://squid.acmeconsulti
On 23/10/2013 7:22 p.m., Dan Charlesworth wrote:
Very edifying. Thanks so much for that Amos.
While the thread’s going, would you be able to elaborate at all on the
“trickery with multiple rules and IPs”?
Well, normally you cant use more than 64K ports on one IP address. But
you can setup mu
On 23/10/2013 7:34 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 23/10/2013 7:22 p.m., Dan Charlesworth wrote:
Very edifying. Thanks so much for that Amos.
While the thread’s going, would you be able to elaborate at all on
the “trickery with multiple rules and IPs”?
Well, normally you cant use more than 64K
23 matches
Mail list logo